FIA sends spy case to Court of Appeal

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

Correct, because far from being "perfectly obvious" it's mere speculation, and we've established that mere speculation proves nothing.

---

I was refferring to specaulation about facts and possibilities of facts being totally different, not to the mental sate of someone charged with a crime. In the absence of mind reading, one must infer intent from the actions of the person in response to circumstances.

While you have been engaging in "could have" this and that, now refute that "could have".....that is totally different.

What reasons did RD have for not turning in the rat is the only question that should be answered.


There is only ONE reasonable inference and the words right out of his mouth condemn him....he knew it was wrong because he ran and tried to hide the source of the information......flight has always been admissible to prove state of mind.....

But RD did use the info to mcLAren's benefit when he "turned in" the alleged "illegal floor" without disclosure of the source--all he had to do was simple--here is this unsolicted sorry email sent to us by some sorry POS, please Mr. FIA, do something ASAP please about the floors and the rat infestation...

and add in the fact, that if he burned the rat, there would be no possible future "information" popping up, so better to keep one's door open....

One burns a rat when one absolutely has no future use for him, and one keeps quiet about the rat, where future possibilities.....

No amount of :beer: can change this, but tis a tangled web we weave when we first practice to deceive.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wmcot

Yeah, but Ron Dennis called it "illegal" so to many posters here, that makes it illegal. RD is their god, his word is final and always truthful.

---

Utter rubbish!

You find me one forum member praying on his knees to the shrine of the God of Ron and I will eat my hat!


:p :

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ian McC

Utter rubbish!

You find me one forum member praying on his knees to the shrine of the God of Ron and I will eat my hat!


:p :

---

I agree, none of them are on their knees praying, they are too busy drinking RD's kool aid

:beer:


You should be glad cause that means you do not have to go buy a hat for your dinner tonight :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ian McC

Utter rubbish!

You find me one forum member praying on his knees to the shrine of the God of Ron and I will eat my hat!


:p :

---

Got no mirror at home?! :p :

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ioan

Got no mirror at home?! :p :

---

Plenty thanks, still not eating my hat though

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ian McC

Utter rubbish!

You find me one forum member praying on his knees to the shrine of the God of Ron and I will eat my hat!


:p :

---

Although I don't have photo evidence, there are a couple of posters on this thread I strongly suspect are worshiping an image of Ron in their McShrines daily (if not more often) ;) This is based entirely on their apparent belief system that Ron is the 2nd perfect being to walk upon the face of the earth.

(p.s. - I don't know if they physically kneel, but from their words they are mentally kneeling to him.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ian McC

Plenty thanks, still not eating my hat though

---

Must be all broken! :p :

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wmcot

Although I don't have photo evidence, there are a couple of posters on this thread I strongly suspect are worshiping an image of Ron in their McShrines daily (if not more often) ;) This is based entirely on their apparent belief system that Ron is the 2nd perfect being to walk upon the face of the earth.

(p.s. - I don't know if they physically kneel, but from their words they are mentally kneeling to him.)

---

Are you a psychologist? :p : :rolleyes:

FIA appeals its own decision. That´s one for the books!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tinchote

Indeed :up:

I would like the people calling Ferrari's floor at Australia "illegal", to show me which sporting regulation was being breached .

---

as we do not have access to the floor and its fixings, we cannot be 100% accurate in our findings otherwise some wisear*e will start quoting chapter and verse of some legal book about inadmissable evidence etc.

what we do know is the following.

1. Ferrari had a performance advantage in Aus that they didnt have after they modified the car.

2. the FIA said that a device that worked in the manner of the one submitted for referal by McLaren off of allegedly a design of the Ferrari one was illegal against the FIA laws I published earlier in the thread. consequently, the FIA changed how the tests were done to ensure people couldnt have a floor that breached this rule.

the rules have not been changed so why remove the flexible fixing, and take a performance hit, if it was legal? it was either legal and didnt need to be changed or illegal and did. saying that it was only illegal when the tests were changed to reflect the cheat does not mean it was legal before, only that it was againt the rules but they got away with it.

nobody has answered this question yet