Wrc+

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by N.O.T

but that is the problem, if you have hordes of headless chickens as fans subscribing to a shit service then the patrician fans like myself are the ones getting screwed.

---

That's not how product management works nowadays... The problem is not that you don't know it, but the fact that the promoter doesn't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AL14

That's not how product management works nowadays... The problem is not that you don't know it, but the fact that the promoter doesn't.

---

That's exactly what he means.

Do you know anything better than wrc+?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mariusz

Do you know anything better than wrc+?

---

No but if it's rubbish it's not worthy to pay for it either.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn Nexus 5 met Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EightGear

That's exactly what he means.

---

No, because the problem is not that "hordes" of people pay for it and so it will remain a mediocre service. It is a bad service because the promoter has no idea about how to deliver a better product that would assure him even more customers.

NOT and the promoter are both wrong but for two different reasons. (IMHO)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mariusz

Do you know anything better than wrc+?

---

that's is a foul logic, its like accepting to listen to nicky minaj just because there are no other bands around.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AL14

No, because the problem is not that "hordes" of people pay for it and so it will remain a mediocre service. It is a bad service because the promoter has no idea about how to deliver a better product that would assure him even more customers.

NOT and the promoter are both wrong but for two different reasons. (IMHO)

---

I agree with You. Though the service seem improving in some ways, but I still don't understand that stupid camera position, that will hardly incline some more to subscribe for it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AL14

No, because the problem is not that "hordes" of people pay for it and so it will remain a mediocre service. It is a bad service because the promoter has no idea about how to deliver a better product that would assure him even more customers.

NOT and the promoter are both wrong but for two different reasons. (IMHO)

---

I'm not sure. What's the incentive for change when people who subscribe to it basically don't really care about the quality? And the promotor is happy with the number of subscribers? It's not like they seem to care about the quality of their product improving...

For me personally WRC+ is the only option of highlights, there's 0 on TV, noting at all. I recently cancelled since I found myself barely watching the programmes anyways. Besides, I always forget about the full event highlights which get uploaded on the Red Bull site after each event. So I guess that's where I'm heading for now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mariusz

Do you know anything better than wrc+?

---

Then I could ask you if you know anything worse ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AL14

No, because the problem is not that "hordes" of people pay for it and so it will remain a mediocre service. It is a bad service because the promoter has no idea about how to deliver a better product that would assure him even more customers.

NOT and the promoter are both wrong but for two different reasons. (IMHO)

---

although i am never wrong when it comes to rallying i will try to explain my reasoning, because i am above all a graceful god.

What WRC+ does is offering a shit service for a ridiculously low price, i believe they bet on the fact that it is easier to lure 100 people to pay 1 yen for a useless product than to risk having 10 people pay 10 yens, because it is easier to sell shit to a million plebeians with low standards than sell a premium service for a premium price to 10 knowledgeable people with high standards.

and above all they bet to people like Mariusz who are willing to accept everything because there is no alternative.