Some people say that less is more.
Printable View
Some people say that less is more.
A few years back it was going to be the removal of the active differentiials that would demolish Loeb....
then the new C4......
ow the tyres.....
.....pathetic but amusing also.....
Dreams are free after all....
I am afraid then why when Loeb fail to set up a good time in any stage, he starts mourning for the tires choice? Does that mean the tires may have almost 50% in total result of any driver?Quote:
Originally Posted by Finni
In all interview with drivers, tire choice is a topic and when they talk about the characteristic of any rally they refer as well to tires choice, etc. Do you think really tires choice is a decisive factor in rally?
What I know is that in F1, the tire is the master factor!!
Michelin and Citroen have a strong relationship since 5 or more years ago. More again, Michelin and Citroen are purely FRENCH. In 2005, Citroen was the only top team running with Michelin while Peugeot did a stupid mistake swicthing on Pirelli. This gave an advantage of Loeb to dominate the WRC in that time.
Maybe we can compare Marcus and Loeb on Michelin but not with Petter because this is his first year on Michelin and he still learning about Michelin.
Sordo is missing the beat completely.
Gronholm only 0.6 of a second behind Loeb. This is a close event!
Team Citroen know what they want, that's way they are getting it. It's not decisive advantage overall, but in some casese it could be crutual. In other words, Citroen has put a lot of effort, research, and funds to develop a good tire for its car, and all that will be taken next year. Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Finni
Because all other teams are loosers and FIA can't afford to keep it this way.
No single driver comment yet. Fine. ****ing fine.
Loeb fastest once again so far from the ford kids....just 0.6 from Gronholm though
anything on crash?
Very good post, respect.Quote:
Originally Posted by WRC2006