Ogier wasn't handed the win at all, at the end of the day he was the one who had the quickest time card over all of the rally and he won, you got to be there at the end to win,neuville wasn't...
Printable View
Hi and welcome to the forum. It depends what you mean by "handed". Yes he was 2nd when Neuville crashed but Neuville crashed by his own fault. On of the challenges of rallying is getting to the end; so I wouldn't say Ogier was handed anything. He simply had the best pace and finished the rally in the shortest time.
I think instead that the analysis is not a problem. On the contrary I really love to analyse everything that I'm interested in.
The problem is how it's done. Overanalysis is bad (I think you're referring to this maybe), as is bad to give conclusion without analysing enough. Imo.
Let's hope Sweden will be less schizophrenic.
Of course we know where is Barbados! Or at least me :D
BTW, I don't believe the victory was handed. Neuville made a mistake, Ogier don't. Maybe Ogier has been a bit lucky to escape some little mistake he made but that's rally and it doesn't mean his victory was handed.
I do remember a few people on this forum saying Mikkelsen was handed his first win by Ogier crashing out, if they're consistent they would say the same about this one.
I agree with you though, they'd be wrong on both counts. A win is a win and as someone once said - to finish first, first you have to finish.
I think Ogier was lucky to get away so light with his few mistakes (Neuville's damaging mistake was smaller than Ogier's but with much worse consequence), but luck is part of rallying too and you have to accept it.
I think the only driver I didn't see* any mistakes from was Tanak, and his car had a 'mistake' instead!
*He might have made mistakes too that I didn't see...
Guys, I think you're in the wrong thread with all the Monte Carlo talk.