2010 Indianapolis 500

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

2nd June 2010, 06:49
SarahFan

Quote:

Originally Posted by call_me_andrew

So what are you doing to fix it?

Im not the problem
2nd June 2010, 07:11
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa

The drivers nationality isn't a deal breaker if they are fun to watch and provide a great show. THAT is the problem right now...the show isn't what it should be.

It is in the U.S.
Our paper in which the columnists rarely pay attention to racing, of any kind, had an article today about the lack of U.S. drivers giving statistics to support how sad it has become.
Local or regional fans used to, and still do for the few that make it, pay a lot of attention when the home town boys appear/ed.

That plus the pathetic generic formula, is making Indy the pathetic thing it has become.
2nd June 2010, 15:36
Lousada

I know some of you don't like to hear this, but the final tv-ratings are in:

Quote:

The race, which aired on ABC (WRTV-TV Channel 6) on Sunday, earned a 3.68 rating,

http://www.ibj.com/blog/article?articleId=20274
2nd June 2010, 16:57
beachbum

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lousada

I know some of you don't like to hear this, but the final tv-ratings are in:

http://www.ibj.com/blog/article?articleId=20274

Down 7%. The Charlotte 600 was reported to be down 8%. So I guess you could say Indy Car did better than NASCAR!.

Of course, hockey beat both of them. It is a changing world. With 200-300 channels, getting better ratings is hard for any niche sport. Like it or not, all racing is a niche sport, even NASCAR.
2nd June 2010, 17:28
SarahFan

Quote:

Originally Posted by beachbum

Down 7%. The Charlotte 600 was reported to be down 8%. So I guess you could say Indy Car did better than NASCAR!.

Of course, hockey beat both of them. It is a changing world. With 200-300 channels, getting better ratings is hard for any niche sport. Like it or not, all racing is a niche sport, even NASCAR.

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/05/31...ak-field/52752

i think the 600 was up... by over a point.... 6+mil viwers is a 5 or so rating isnt it?
2nd June 2010, 18:46
Lousada

Quote:

Originally Posted by beachbum

Down 7%. The Charlotte 600 was reported to be down 8%. So I guess you could say Indy Car did better than NASCAR!.

Of course, hockey beat both of them. It is a changing world. With 200-300 channels, getting better ratings is hard for any niche sport. Like it or not, all racing is a niche sport, even NASCAR.

Last year the 600 was rain-delayed. It's 8% down compared to 2008. In 2008 the 500 got a 4.6. So in the same period Indy went down 20% compared to 8% for the 600.

Actually the Indy500 scored a worse rating than the season average for Nascar!!!
2nd June 2010, 18:50
beachbum

Quote:

Originally Posted by SarahFan

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/05/31...ak-field/52752

i think the 600 was up... by over a point.... 6+mil viwers is a 5 or so rating isnt it?

Last year the race ran on Monday where ratings were way down from 2008

http://sportsmediawatch.blogspot.com...0-matches.html
2nd June 2010, 22:35
Mark in Oshawa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Riebe

It is in the U.S.
Our paper in which the columnists rarely pay attention to racing, of any kind, had an article today about the lack of U.S. drivers giving statistics to support how sad it has become.
Local or regional fans used to, and still do for the few that make it, pay a lot of attention when the home town boys appear/ed.

That plus the pathetic generic formula, is making Indy the pathetic thing it has become.

The Generic formula is a bigger issue than the drivers. I do agree tho, the fans want one of their own to cheer on, but you cant dumb down the world so your guys can keep up. Fans flock to races in Canada where they may have one guy in the field. Some years we had none. I think the personality of the guys at the top of the series is a lot of what you need, and if the people in marketing with the IRL cannot use people like Dix, Dario and Helio (not to mention Ms. Judd) then it isn't the fan who is not getting it, it is the marketing department.
2nd June 2010, 23:36
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lousada

I know some of you don't like to hear this, but the final tv-ratings are in:

http://www.ibj.com/blog/article?articleId=20274

Put the damn race back to its earlier starting time. Changing that was one of George's most moronic moves.
Still when NASCAR has its own quasi-network, its hard to beat with generic Formula Honda .

The new formula is not going to change that if they stick with the pathetic new proposal.
The gear-heads used to be the fan base and they have been crapped on royally.
3rd June 2010, 03:42
call_me_andrew

Quote:

Originally Posted by beachbum

Down 7%. The Charlotte 600 was reported to be down 8%. So I guess you could say Indy Car did better than NASCAR!.

Of course, hockey beat both of them. It is a changing world. With 200-300 channels, getting better ratings is hard for any niche sport. Like it or not, all racing is a niche sport, even NASCAR.

I read an article concerning the decline in Indy 500 ratings this year. One person commented and claimed it is "Because NASCAR is booooooooooooooooooooooooring," his spelling, not mine.

I wouldn't call racing a "niche sport". In terms of global audience Formula One is second only to soccer.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page