FIA sends spy case to Court of Appeal

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

There's little or no difference between what you're saying McLaren should have done, and what they did do.

---

Huh? you are a mod here? You ARE trolling. What the hell, dude? It's perfectly obvious they acted in a way to protect themselves from being suspect of having information they should not have had, that they in fact illegally had on top of trying to hold on to the secrecy of their spy whom provided it..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hendersen

Huh? you are a mod here? You ARE trolling. What the hell, dude? It's perfectly obvious they acted in a way to protect themselves from being suspect of having information they should not have had, that they in fact illegally had on top of trying to hold on to the secrecy of their spy whom provided it..

---

So had they forwarded the email and deleted the name, which is what you say they should have done, what difference would that have made to the outcome?

The information would still have got to the FIA. The FIA would still have acted. Stepney's name would still have been kept out of it.

You say that McLaren "should not have had" the email. Well, if a Ferrari employee had not sent it in the first place Coughlan would not have had it in his inbox.

You say that McLaren had the email "illegally". Did they steal it? Did they break into Maranello under cover of the night and escape with the email? Did they phone a Ferrari employee and ask for it? Nope. None of the above. A Ferrari employee sent it to a McLaren employee.

As for the "secrecy of their spy" - That's exactly the kind of circumstantial accusation I was referring to earlier. There are lots of them thrown about regularly as if they were facts in this case.

why bother Arrorw. the bloke has more flames than Burger king.

Some people are a bit touchy around here because the "McLaren truth" it's not as obvious as they thought it is! :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

Did they phone a Ferrari employee and ask for it?

---

It might be! :p :

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

So had they forwarded the email and deleted the name, which is what you say they should have done, what difference would that have made to the outcome?

---

Uhh, it would have went a long way in clearing Mclaren of wrong doing. Instead, it now looks like they are rotten to the core and were being purposefully deceitful to the FIA. And I never said that's what they should have done, you were trying to spin the entire scenario as if that what actually happened. Do not project your BS on me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

The information would still have got to the FIA. The FIA would still have acted. Stepney's name would still have been kept out of it.

You say that McLaren "should not have had" the email. Well, if a Ferrari employee had not sent it in the first place Coughlan would not have had it in his inbox.

---

Actually, Ferrari had nothing to be concerned about as far as legality was concerned. They were not the ones with illegal info on their computers. Mclaren was.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

You say that McLaren had the email "illegally". Did they steal it? Did they break into Maranello under cover of the night and escape with the email? Did they phone a Ferrari employee and ask for it? Nope. None of the above. A Ferrari employee sent it to a McLaren employee.

---

It's not different than stolen property. Stop with your useless canards and BS attempts at rationalzing. It doesn't how they got it. They could bought it at a rummage sale. Having it is illegal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

As for the "secrecy of their spy" - That's exactly the kind of circumstantial accusation I was referring to earlier. There are lots of them thrown about regularly as if they were facts in this case.

---

Why else didn't Mclaren immediately contact Ferrari that they had a leaker and contact the FIA and tell them the situation in full? Mclaren is not some 2 year old that doesn't quite understand the rules of grown ups. They know god damn well what's going on and when/if they could be held responsible for something. Hopefully it blows up in their obviously cheating faces.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hendersen

And I never said that's what they should have done...

---

So who exactly posted this :confused: :crazy:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hendersen

Quit making it sound like they forwarded the email and deleted the name, which is what they should have done.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

So who exactly posted this :confused: :crazy:

---

Complete trolling. That was a sarcastic post directed at your BS comments about how you were trying to make the scenario sound. It was not my suggestion they do such, you were suggesting that's what they actually did..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hendersen

Complete trolling. That was a sarcastic directed at your BS comments about how you were trying to make the scenario sound. It was not my suggestion they do such, you were suggesting that's what they actually did, nor should have done.

---

like when you claimed that there has never been a contested pit lane place and a load of other BS (as you put it).

thims for beddy byes :z :arrows:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Flat.tyres

like when you claimed that there has never been a contested pit lane place and a load of other BS (as you put it).

thims for beddy byes :z :arrows:

---

I said I never saw one like alonso turning the pitlane into a drag race. Must forgive me for not watching every practice run, qualifying lap, and race. Sometimes we don't even get GPs in the united states, and sometimes they are several hours delayed( and unless something controversial happened, why watch). Stay on topic and quit trolling like your pal.