Oooohhhhhh, get you!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
Printable View
Oooohhhhhh, get you!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
There is something that has always intrigued me when conversing with "born agains" and their belief system. It appears to me as a totally self absorbed way of looking at their maker and what he want irrespective of what those in hearing distance wish to hear.
I saw on Sunday a QB (quarter back)for an American NFL team that has become famous because of his Christian beliefs which he spouts ad nauseam when given the chance. I guess he believes that JC is looking a/after him only b/ his team and c/ the other team is a bunch of heathens.
Oh, and by the way to Danica Fan and Bob Riebe. How do you rationalize execution and war even if it is for your own defense when it clearly states "Thou shalt not Kill". I don't see anything about killing murderers or collateral damage victims such as those in all the wars and violence since time immemorial.
About a week? Are we making Jacob's Creek?Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
Go to post 183 and then how I responded to Dave's statement and then how Henner respondeded to my response and then how I respondededed to Henner's incorrrect reading of my responses and then....Quote:
Originally Posted by GridGirl
It will tell you how it got to this point.
OK let's do this one more time: Muslims use the Koran as the reason, and the only reason they need, for their indiscriminate killing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave B
No other religion murders women and children because verses of their holy book tells them to.
Some one, you, earlier said that Christians killed people because the Bible tells them to, now give me the numbers of people killed by Christians who did it because the Blble told them to do it
You cannot use the Crusades, which is the usual response, unless you can prove they did it because the Bible, (not to forget the insulting of Mohammed is reason enough for murder) told them to.
If the numbers are not similar, and the reason for the killing similar, then there is no comparison and the Christian analogy is bogus, based on varying levels of bias.
Maybe you would also like to inform us how you got to the point of writing words like 'respondeded' and 'respondededed'? Are each of these successively more important or longer responses?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Riebe
Nice try bunky.Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
Because if I had actually finished the sentence it would have been up to- respondededededed or thereabouts.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
It was ededed enough.
If this Riebe-show is anything to go by, heaven must be full of nutters ! :laugh:
Repetitiveiveiveiveive nutters.Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote