Printable View
Emphasis at any form in multiple choice didn't reflect equality while it is a must :)
I only don't hope the group of minority in the US chose the wrong person (again) after knowing campaign to accommodate their problematical issue proved otherwise.
Like it or not he has significant support of 68% polling held recently from nowhere previously.
He's ruled it out anyway, so it's a non issue :p
I voted yes.. like why the hell not? I think he would be putting out a great message to the USA and the world to try to reduce global warming ! this way it can actually get done unlike the others who will just be dancing around the idea :dosey:
I don't know that the candidate will keep all the words for the more proper solution on peace instead of war, but a good natured politician and being popular in the more educated voter should dedicate all he has when the populace call him for the presidential seat. :)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/2/hi/...as/7048370.stm as Mark said. Non issue :)
He is enrouting to it with courtesy :)
Am I the only person thinking wtf? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by leopardsleeping
Yes and no. It's something that needs to have it's profile raised. But when you do it by twisting the facts then it's not good.Quote:
Originally Posted by raikk
Worse Than Failure? :( ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
The one guy who would call himslef a Republican(Guilliani for Pres here), that would not want him to run. He would take money from people who could easily spend it elsewhere on the world, helping the economy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark