George Zimmerman verdict just in . . .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vhatever

He has a legal right to carry a gun; it's enshrined in our constitution even. And you would really be dumb enough to attack someone with a gun? Save the bluster for the naive or ignorant. Martin thought zimmerman was an easy mark. He wanted to be a thug and he died like a thug.

---

He wanted to be a thug, is this because he's black and black people are all thugs? :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel

He wanted to be a thug, is this because he's black and black people are all thugs? :confused:

---

From superman to mind reader. is there anything you can't do behind the safety of your computer?

What a surprise that those defending the verdict are the inarticulate ones, while those who question it can write properly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vhatever

From superman to mind reader. is there anything you can't do behind the safety of your computer?

---

Oh I don't know, go looking for a fight and shoot an unarmed person with my gun and feel like a big man?

Just a question, I am against guns entirely, I think they do way more harm than good, but what if Zimmerman didn't have one, or hadn't used it? Wouldn't we now be in court discussing why Martin is now being trialled for murder and whether or not Zimmerman should have used or had gun to protect himself?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leighton323

Just a question, I am against guns entirely, I think they do way more harm than good, but what if Zimmerman didn't have one, or hadn't used it? Wouldn't we now be in court discussing why Martin is now being trialled for murder and whether or not Zimmerman should have used or had gun to protect himself?

---

If Zimmerman didn't have a gun, he wouldn't have followed the guy and nothing would have happened, at worst someone's house may have possibly gotten broken into......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel

If Zimmerman didn't have a gun, he wouldn't have followed the guy and nothing would have happened, at worst someone's house may have possibly gotten broken into......

---

But his job was to patrol the neighbourhood, just like in NZ where police don't have guns. Just because try font have guns doesn't mean they don't want to stop crime?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel

If Zimmerman didn't have a gun, he wouldn't have followed the guy and nothing would have happened, at worst someone's house may have possibly gotten broken into......

---

But his job was to patrol the neighbourhood, just like in NZ where police don't have guns. Just because they don't have guns doesn't mean they don't want to stop crime?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel

He wanted to be a thug, is this because he's black and black people are all thugs? :confused:

---

What a surprise, Daniel follows his own Rule 1: "Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I (sic) would say that though." (a quote complete with the typo)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BDunnell

What a surprise that those defending the verdict are the inarticulate ones, while those who question it can write properly.

---

Really? See above. Anyway, what a surprise. Dunnell engages in a personal attack to bait someone. I like that though, as it proves an old saying: Argue the law. When that is failing, argue the facts. When that is also failing, engage in name calling.....

Guys, we want a debate. Don't turn this into anything personal by attacking each other. Discuss the topic.