Let's put it in equivalent terms.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
The male equivalent of female circumcision is having the head of your penis cut off.
Printable View
Let's put it in equivalent terms.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
The male equivalent of female circumcision is having the head of your penis cut off.
The plain fact is that we don't need this sh!t and we should ban any future immigration and move to deport as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by gloomyDAY
No, I'm saying that if we ban female circumcision, we should IMO also ban male circumcision for religious or cultural reasons. I think it's quite hypocritical that just one is banned. Here in Finland we have even banned the cutting off puppies' tails like some dog owners have done, but male circumcision for religious reasons is still allowed. I'm against any kind of mutilation of babies and puppies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roamy
EKi I don't think you are really getting the relationship between cutting off a little worthless skin and altering a woman's life. There is quite a difference and really cannot be compared. You hate jews so bad you left the skin on your dick but a clit is much more valuable. I have to agree with you about the dogs tails although we still allow it here. Hell we allow Pit Bulls a totally worthless and extremely dangerous dog. It is time we started banning dogs along with Muslims.
While I don't agree with either practice when performed on infants or people unable to make the decision for themselves, "female circumcision" has become an overly misused term when it's used as a catch-all to describe any and all sorts of female genital cutting. Again, this is another example of why it would be good for our schools to begin teaching Latin again. Then maybe people would better understand the (actual) definition of words. Circumcision is a procedure which goes around the organ and would remove the prepuce or "hood" (similar to the foreskin in the male). It is not removal of the organ itself. In this case that would be a clitoridectomy. In the late 70's and early 80's female circumcision became sort of a fad surgery among some American women, because they believed it led to greater sensitivity by having that organ MORE exposed.
Anyway, I'm not a doctor - I just took some biology along the way. And being that this is a family forum, I'm not sure that this is an appropriate topic for this board. But at the very least, it would be nice for people to use the correct terms. Circumcision, whether performed on male or female children is (by definition) genital mutilation. People who are OK with one but not the other are (IMO) hypocrites. I don't agree with the practice of subjecting infants and children to any sort of mutilation... and I don't care what religion a person wants to hide behind.
Forgive me, but how on earth is this post deemed acceptable by the moderators?Quote:
Originally Posted by Roamy
Well put.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jag_Warrior
It is unbelievable. But somehow I'm not surprised that this poster thinks it is okay to compare muslims to dogs.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Oh Oh Oh I telling Dad. Get over it freak!Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Eki, would you welcome sharia courts in Finland? Yes or no?