Poll on who was at fault

Poll! I want to know a percentage of what the readers of this specific forum think, out of curiousity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by theugsquirrel

Poll! I want to know a percentage of what the readers of this specific forum think, out of curiousity.

---

So do I; as against the number of posts (most by two guys here) blaming one or the other. Certain people believe that if they keep posting to assert their view and that the opposing view of anyone else is wrong is the way to prove who is right and who is wrong.

Then when you try to get the general consensus, one even suggests that it is "bullpoop".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valve Bounce

So do I; as against the number of posts (most by two guys here) blaming one or the other. Certain people believe that if they keep posting to assert their view and that the opposing view of anyone else is wrong is the way to prove who is right and who is wrong.

Then when you try to get the general consensus, one even suggests that it is "bullpoop".

---

funny that...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valve Bounce

No it doesn't. But it does indicate the view of the majority of the forum members here. Are you against that?

---

Are you spoiling for a fight or something? :confused: I clearly have said NO many times. Give it a break.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AJP

funny that...

---

it did come from redbulls

In the absence of a poll, what say we simply post "Vettel's fault", "Webber's fault", or "50/50". I'm sure we can all count.

Vettel's fault. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Valve Bounce

So do I; as against the number of posts (most by two guys here) blaming one or the other. Certain people believe that if they keep posting to assert their view and that the opposing view of anyone else is wrong is the way to prove who is right and who is wrong.

Then when you try to get the general consensus, one even suggests that it is "bullpoop".

---

Funny that you take my comments out of context. All I am saying by citing examples from the past is that the majority is not always right. I mean ffs a majority of people in the US voted that moron Dubya in. Are you going to say they were right? I'm not against people having opinions, I'm merely against the idea that because the majority agree one something that they're somehow proven right.

TBH the only driver (ex or current) I've heard defending Seb's actions has been the Vet himself. I've yet to heard from anyone who has gone wheel to wheel with someone on a track support Vettel's action - and I doubt I will. Wheels interlocked at 200mph you simply Do NOT move over. Fact.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel

This is pointless. Most of you guys were in agreement that all was hunky dory when Lewis Hamilton cut that chicane in Spa in 2007. So to say that a majority agreement means something is complete bullpoop

---

And I say again: we just want to know the general consensus. There is nothing said so far that the general consensus is correct, or wrong. But to say it is bullpoop is extraordinarily dictatorial. It simply means one does not care what other people's opinions are.

For the record, I think it is Vettel's fault.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sonic

TBH the only driver (ex or current) I've heard defending Seb's actions has been the Vet himself. I've yet to heard from anyone who has gone wheel to wheel with someone on a track support Vettel's action - and I doubt I will. Wheels interlocked at 200mph you simply Do NOT move over. Fact.

---

Well there's Helmut Marko.