A piece of poo might be better than crap, but both are still ShXtty!Quote:
Originally Posted by Lousada
Anything on ABC less than 1.5, will not help at all. This does not help, and in fact hurts.
Indy needs to have a BIG rating.
Printable View
A piece of poo might be better than crap, but both are still ShXtty!Quote:
Originally Posted by Lousada
Anything on ABC less than 1.5, will not help at all. This does not help, and in fact hurts.
Indy needs to have a BIG rating.
Aha, you can't say American's don't like oval racing, just not for open wheel cars.Quote:
Originally Posted by SarahFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleEye
Yep, Yep
For the sport really to be helped Indy needs to be around a 5.0
If .8 is the actual number, then I agree: pretty much within the range of expectations. Nothing has happened which would cause viewership to go up dramatically. That .8 is in the lower range of where AOWR has been for the past decade on network over-air TV.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lousada
how does that differ from nascar on a 2 mile oval? thats crap racing yet it rates very well? perhaps it's because I'm not american but I simply don't get it.Quote:
Originally Posted by harvick#1
because the only race in which the driver can go flat out the entire race is Talladega, every other tracks forces the driver to have to life off the gas pedal and sometimes lay on the brakes a tadQuote:
Originally Posted by SUBARUTEAM
at Michigan and Fontana, the cars cant stay in the flat out position, its still up to the driver to have to lift and when the go back to the throttle
Actually NASCAR ratings are down from the high of a couple of years ago, and NASCAR fans complain a lot about cookie-cutter tracks. NASCAR's TV ratings on the cookie-cutter tracks are lower then they are for the super-speedways or short tracks.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBARUTEAM
Stock cars still have to lift at Michigan and Fontana. There's still a 50mph difference between the top straightaway speed and slowest corner speed.Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBARUTEAM
Hell, they're even lifting at Daytona now.
I think he was adressing the quality of racing more than the quantity of viewers.Quote:
Originally Posted by e2mtt
Yes, as in NASCAR having to lift/brake rather than run flat out. My point was that the cookie-cutter tracks don't produce great racing for anybody, including NASCAR. I'm not sure why we have so many of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by call_me_andrew
Cookie cutter tracks were popular among track owners because they better sightlines than traditional ovals (a fan sitting in turn 4 doesn't have to turn his head 90 degrees to see turn one).
Plus it's easy to fit a roval into a 1.5 mile trioval so when your big ticket series isn't in town, you can still have track days and club racing.