Mosley 'knows' who set him up

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tamburello

Totally agree.

Sadly, there are those on this forum who will never acknowledge that because it suits their own agenda.

They should be truly ashamed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trumperZ06

:dozey: Hhmmm... poor ole Max gets caught with his pants down...

Bribes his way into remaining in office...

and now wants to bring the culprit to justice.



:p : Maybe the teams should pony up the $$$ to solve the case....






;) Buy Max a mirror !!!

---

Thanks for proving my point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PolePosition_1

Rightly so in my mind, I hope those do get punished. A huge invasion of his privacy and shouldn't be allowed. He was subject to judgement via tabloid media, which no one should be subjected to in my mind.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tamburello

Totally agree.

Sadly, there are those on this forum who will never acknowledge that because it suits their own agenda.

---

I don't think there is much dispute over the invasion of privacy aspect of this. It's well known that the NoTW make it their business to "uncover" the private lives of public figures. Max was not the first to suffer from "exposure" in this way and he will not be the last. The issue of "media freedom" is a wide ranging one, and certainly much wider than Max's case alone.

That said, Max would have us believe that his case is somewhat different, perhaps because it suits his agenda to do so.

So the Mosley bashing is on again?!

Nice to see what people are interested most in F1, the color of the cars, of the tires and the private life of those involved. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

I don't think there is much dispute over the invasion of privacy aspect of this.

---

Didn't notice you saying that when you were in full anti-Max bash-mode when the story broke.

How do you sleep at night?

;) Not sure that Max's position... after all he is a public figure,

Being President of the FIA... makes this an "invasion of privacy" issue !!!

Either way:

Any reputable organization would have forced him out of office for failing to meet "The morals clause" .

No "entrapment" was involved, this was a self inflicted situation.

Once it became known to the public, this type of deviate sexual behavor, would normally result in either a resignation or dismissal.



:D Oh, and most of us sleep very well at night, thanks for asking.

:p : Only you Trolls seem to have trouble getting a good night's sleep !!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tamburello

Didn't notice you saying that when you were in full anti-Max bash-mode when the story broke.

How do you sleep at night?

---

Don't make fun of his epiphany . It's cruel .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bagwan

Don't make fun of his epiphany . It's cruel .

---

What "epiphany"? The NoTW has always been tomorrow's fish & chip paper :laugh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

What "epiphany"? The NoTW has always been tomorrow's fish & chip paper :laugh:

---

;) Ummm... I thought that the NoTW epiphany...

only applied to the January 6th issue !!!

:s mokin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trumperZ06

Once it became known to the public, this type of deviate sexual behavor, would normally result in either a resignation or dismissal.

---

First of all, as long as it is between adult people it's not of public interest.

2nd. Deviate sexual behavior? Compared to what and judged by whom?!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tamburello

Totally agree.

Sadly, there are those on this forum who will never acknowledge that because it suits their own agenda.

They should be truly ashamed.

---

Is this — i.e. holding an opinion different to your own — genuinely something that should make one 'truly ashamed'? You are blowing it out of all proportion.