2011 WRC Rally Mexico

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OldF

My theory/logic why the C4 was better is that the C4 IMO used about 1000 rpm higher revs than the Focus. With higher revs the C4 didn’t had to “breath” the same amount of air true the restrictor as the Focus

---

Say what? Higher revs means more burn cycles means more air used and all air must come through restrictor...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by N.O.T

hirvonen was 1 second faster than his 2010 time. lets see if the trend continues up to the guy who wins the stage....

---

Thats good for the speed of the new wrc cars,but still a fast ss with average speed at 100km/h.I expect to be slower in ss with low average speed compared with previous wrc cars.

nope...latvalas time was 14:01,9 in 2010 and 14:02.9 this year

ogier was 2 seconds slower than his 2010 time....13.58 compared to 13.56

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jonkka

Say what? Higher revs means more burn cycles means more air used and all air must come through restrictor...

---

+1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GINE

latvala same time as last year. So the gap between ford and citroen is significantly redusced

---

Didn t catch you...explain please

not a good stage for solberg....

Ogier and Loeb are going to have an amazing battle as it seems....

Yeh, Petter is somewhat subdued... strange...

Last years stage winner on the first pass had a time of 13:51 seconds and was solberg.....this year the winner did it in 13.58...7 seconds in 24kms...not bad.


ostberg puntcure....