Printable View
No it's not, maybe part of the reason to be on the cover, but not the reason why the magazine pays attention to all classes. In general some 1/3 of reports from WRC events are about WRC2/3 and JWRC. Also from ERC there is some attention to JERC and production cup.Quote:
Originally Posted by WUff1
Have you seen this?
http://www.wewantkubica.pl/
Sorry to ask such a question but I was out for the whole rally. Is it true that Kubica was ignored by official WRC media?
I think he was only out off the daily results board. In the coverage he was shown many times and on stage end reports interviewed aswell.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirek
I can see he was 66th after day 1, 30th after day 2, 17th after day 3 and retired after day 4. Therefore it is normal if he was not shown in top 10.Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis44
Than I don't understand what the fuss is about...Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis44
He has been in coverage indeed, also live. On thursday night and sunday morning on live stages he had as much attention as anyone else. It's quite idiotic to complain, you can't expect him to have more attention than the people in the lead. Maybe he could have scored more attention if he had a consistent drive and good finish...
Exactly. There seem to be overreact by fans, as usual perhaps. He won some stages, ok it was noted in daily coverage, but didn't change the overall leader board.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirek
WRC has some stages summary during the rally, he was ignored in these for example on friday when he won 3 of them. That was when the fuss began.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirek
So he was shown in the official footage? Then I don't get this action at all...
Just to make it clear - I don't watch the official footage, I find Internet and YouTube better, so I don't know who was shown and who was not.
On live coverage he was shown. During stage summaries he was ignored, they didn't even show stage results. That was the beginning of it.