C'mon, I thought you were part of those 5%. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Sonic
Printable View
C'mon, I thought you were part of those 5%. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Sonic
So the sort of racing where you could watch the start, see the order after the first round of stops and then come back for the champagne and know the results is what we want?Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Some of you guys seem like the sort of "connoisseurs" who could sniff, swill and spit out a glass of piss that had been dyed red to look like wine and comment on its fruity aroma, full bodied taste and tart aftertase on the tongue. F1 sucked most of the time other than when it was wet and the fact that the FIA felt the need to do something about it backs that up.
If they fight for places I don't care if the order changes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
How the heck can people be so superficial and chose form over substance? :rolleyes:
I said most ;) I'd be fine. Better than fine. Awesome. Legendary even.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
The fights were largely stacked in favour of the driver in front though. Personally I prefer the way things are now where qualifying isn't quite as important as before and managing your tyres is more important.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Agreed. For the first time in a long time if a driver is catching another they stand a very good chance of getting by.
I think it was a bit too easy in Turkey.
Wouldn't you MUCH prefer it to be more or less impossible for a driver to get by and to almost need to risk an accident each overtake? That's muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuch better!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
I'm being sarcastic btw.
Yes? No? What was the question?
Are you a connoiseur who longs for the old days of racing and is willing to criticise the sport when it tries to bring racing back?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
Racing is not about catching someone it's about getting by. I suggest rally for those who don't care about racing as racing is defined.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark