it's changed slightly... now it's also
powered by vBulletin childrens science definitions
Printable View
it's changed slightly... now it's also
powered by vBulletin childrens science definitions
All nonsense, as I would expect from you. Your first paragraph is especially absurd. Bullying is no-one's fault other than the bully's. As a right-winger, I presume you believe in people taking personal responsibility? Well, why not apply it in this case?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bezza
I resent being told by someone whose opinions I consider ill-developed that my sexuality alone renders me inferior at anything.
I couldn't agree more. The backward, unenlightened thinking that accompanies this topic is unsurprising to some extent, but largely just saddening.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knock-on
Sorry, it wasn't designed to be an insult or insinuation and I apologise if it came across as such.Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
Personally, I agree with the main thrust of your point. If all other conditions are identical, it is better for the Child, IMHO, to grow up with both a positive male and a female role model. That is not any sort of slight to same sex partners but I feel that it is less complicated for the child, as you have said, and also a male and female bring different strengths and benefits to a childs development. This is looking purely from the childs side.
However, as I have said, there are thousands of Children out there that can be adopted or fostered and it is better to have a loving household for them to go to rather than worry about the sexuality of the parents.
Infuriating.....Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
But as far as I remember you ( and most of the fellow forumers ) don't believe in God.
Then where this anger come from? And then why should do 2 people ( homo or hetero ) marry at all?
P.S. I reckon my english is poor and I understand you're a sort of master of the words. I might me confusing the meaning of two words: marriage and wedding. In my mind marriage can be civil or/and religious, wedding is only in front of God.
Hey Knockie, panic ye not, for that was more to enforce my own viewpoint, for those that struggle with it - you have no need to apologise as you have not insulted anyone, let alone me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knock-on
But the last sentence of your second paragraph is the bit that I think gets lost, and some have not and do not wish, to consider - i.e. how does all this affect the child. Sometimes I think there are some that get too wrapped up in their own selfish need for a notion of equality that has the potential to steamroller roughshod over the needs of the child(ren).
Well, I only speak English, and I completely understood your post.Quote:
Originally Posted by gadjo_dilo
Interesting the way most of you see the kids issue....
As if a kid might be affected only because the other kids would bully him and he has no his own needs and desires. That sometimes might don't match the idea of 2 parents of same sex.
Also interesting that when we debated the religion topics some of you say that a kid shouldn't be raised in a certain religion but be left to grow up and choose what suites him.
Isn't the same possibility that a kid raised by a same sex couple couldn't be happy with this alternative?
Death of parents excepted, why are there so many unwanted children. There is a serious education issue here IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knock-on
Religion is a choice, or it should be. Can you chose your parents? For a child that has been abandoned, someone is chosing the parents for them. That can only ever be the equivalent of 'making the best of a bad job' IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by gadjo_dilo