No. There is difference in FIA ideas among the years. It was same with "senior" category. In ERC it was refused and few years later introduced in WRC...
Printable View
I am not little girl that can be inspired to became rally driver but if I would, I think I would be more inspired if I see female driver competing like equal with male drivers than see female drivers having their own little competition.
From rally fan perspective, I also don't like Lia Block choosing circuit racing route.
The selection pool for female competitors is very small in all motorsport so it's statistically improbable to have competitors at top level. Such programmes are intended to show that it's possible and increase interest with the idea that with increased interest there will be a higher selection pool and therefore a higher chance of someone talented appearing. It's perhaps anecdotal but interesting how 15 years after Leena Gade was featured in Audi's Truth in 24 II Le Mans film there are several female race engineers and strategists working at high level including F1.
I am not arguing about programme. I like idea to make sure top female talent would get funding. I am arguing against women-only cups.
Same with Toyota promoting Japanese drivers. I think it's cool they are doing it but "non-European drivers championships" would be silly.
That's intertwined. First you need to get the female competitors on board and by not having this female cups where they and their sponsors get attention you end with having no female competitors at all because in past fourty years no woman has been able to make it in the rallying top level on her own.
I wouldn't take it as a gender thing. For me it's basically the same like when you create a cup for juniors. You do that because you want to help them in their career which would otherwise be much harder.
For me it's more like you are supporting driver of specific nationality, like Toyota did with Katsuta and Hiroki Arai. You find some young drivers with potential and not exactly let them "make it on their own" but make sure they have right opportunities to develop. Female driver would quite naturally get attention once she will reach solid WRC2 skill level, also from sponsors.
Ladies Trophy didn't bring too much attention, if Search Tool doesn't lie, it didn't even had own thread on this forum despite being run by many years.
It still brough more girls to the international rallying than any other activity in decades.
Sadly nobody has succeeded in what you propose in past fourty years. In theory it's of course right but in real life it never worked that way.
And he does get a chance! Neuville will also participate in Orlen Lietuva Rally 2024
Interesting to see what cars they will be using. I have understood that there is one testing car which was used by Tänak in ERC Rally Estonia. So I assume they could repair that?
No please & No thank you:
https://dirtfish.com/rally/wrc/capit...role-if-asked/
Didn't he leave WIlliams under a cloud of fraud allegations?
Even without this, the WRC doesn't need him around...
Surely not...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRyxmujX...g&name=900x900
ORLEN Lietuva Rally facebook:
Quote:
Many of you have probably already seen Ott Tänak's breathtaking crash during Rally Estonia 2024. 🤯
How is this related to ORLEN Lietuva Rally 2024?
The car driven by Ott was supposed to arrive in Ma˛eiki today, but a painful accident changed the plans of the entire Hyundai Motorsport team, and although the team tried hard to assemble a new car in a few days, due to the lack of details and time resources, T. Neuville unfortunately, but we will not see in our gravel.
So championship leader won't get any test before gravel rallies because his teammate just destroyed the car. Great job, Ott
But then you have to ask what if and what if some more. What if 2 or 3 are written off in Latvia with Finland so soon? To justify another build they'd need to also expand the testing programme, which they can't and wouldn't want to; or either expand the extra rallies program or find customers in WRC, both which is against the idea of Rally1 and involves a high risk/reward ratio - they just wrote one off for nothing.
It is unclear if Neuville’s withdrawal from Lietuva Rally is a direct consequence of Tänak’s accident damage, but it would appear likely.
In a statement supplied to DirtFish, Hyundai confirmed: “We decided that due to other activities, Thierry will not participate in the rally in Lithuania. EP will be there as planned.”
Hyundai will also be in the UK this weekend, attending the Goodwood Festival of Speed with Dani Sordo present. DirtFish understands Neuville was originally scheduled to attend before he was entered into Lietuva Rally.
https://dirtfish.com/rally/wrc/hyund...warm-up-entry/
I have nothing personal against Tanak, I'm just complaining about his driving.
Because you can rise above the people who hate (big word, let's say constantly complain about / make up every reason to criticize) another driver because it's not their favourite driver.
It's obvious Tanak didn't have a big crash on purpose, he wasn't able to test much either. In any case, I doubt much changes for Neuville: he's first on the road anyway, it's probably going to be dry and it's fast gravel... even with some more testing for the new engine mapping, he'll lose tons of time regardless. He should bring it home hoping others hit trouble, no chance for a big result based on speed. Hopefully he'll get to test for later rallies.
This is not true. Why would they bother testing at all if it didn't accomplish anything, especially for a brand-new car? The main issue was that Hyundai started very late. As a result, they had only a limited number of days to test everything. Because Neuville crashed so badly, they couldn't test their new car on gravel at all, which meant they had to homologate the car without knowing how it would perform on gravel. If they had done some testing, they would have had some idea of what was working and what wasn't, giving them a better base to move forward. Instead, they had to guess and homologate based on what they had.
No, you can't fix something so flawed with just few more test days, especially because they were already running late. Even if let's say the suspension broke during testing (they were testing on asphalt, vast majority of their suspension problems were on gravel), they would have assumed it was just a regular failure. And even if they realized a bigger flaw, would have they been able to change much in such a short time before homologation? Hardly.
The reality is that neither Tanak nor Neuville could have won the championship driving that "amazing quality" Hyundai against Kalle's Toyota, not in a milllion years.
https://www.autosport.com/wrc/news/w...urs-/10633633/
Peter Thul WRC Promoter’s Senior Director of Sport told Autosport/Motorsport.com: "....I also hope if we have good [2027] regulations done by the end of the year..."
and in other news, Wales Rally GB will be back by 2027....they hardly managed getting these regs in time, I highly doubt they'll do that for 2027, I hope they prove me (& any other doubters out there) wrong.
Depends, coud be miserable every day and could be a month long drought. You never know whats your gonna get here.
But looking at the forecast it looks to be like a high pressure zones over eastern/central europe next week. So looks to be like a dry and dusty rally coming....for now.
WRC set for major presence at Goodwood Festival of Speed starting today
https://www.wrc.com/a/news/w28206_WR...tival-of-Speed
Rally Stage stream (only Sordo here I think, others will do the Hill Climb)...
https://www.youtube.com/live/6OfKXRw...vZ1QSu5pDRi7-G