Originally Posted by F1boat
You know, year after year I heard how irrelevant testing is and in the end it proves to be very useful, if you like to make predictions.
Several examples:
Last year everybody thought that Brawn are hunting for sponsors. But they were for real.
In 2005, everybody thought that there is no way for Renault and McLaren-Mercedes to suddenly overcome the mighty Ferrari. But they did.
A year before, in 2004, Ferrari were one second ahead of Williams and McLaren and guess what - they really owned them!
And between 2006 and 2008 the testing were with mixed results - and the championships were real close! So while it's a bit premature to make predictions based on one test, to say that tests are meaningless is to me incorrect.