Yes it would. But it would still be only 4%.
<Dang. I wish I could go back in time and learn how to spell.
DOES SOMEONE HAVE A SPARE TARDIS I COULD BORROW? :D >
Printable View
Yes it would. But it would still be only 4%.
<Dang. I wish I could go back in time and learn how to spell.
DOES SOMEONE HAVE A SPARE TARDIS I COULD BORROW? :D >
Haven't you heard. We are running deficits. Huge freaking deficits. About $9,000,000,000,000 in deficits in the next 10 years. That means WE HAVE NO MONEY. NONE. 4%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.000000004%, it doesn't matter, that would be MORE than we have. Don't you get that? If you are personally in bankruptcy, can't pay your bills, have more money going out than comming in, what is the solution? Buy a bunch of more stuff? Come on man, that's crazy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollo
And yes the system is broken. NO ONE disputes that. But there are about 75-80% of the people in this country that are at least somewhat satisfied with their healthcare. So why should we (further) mortgage the futures of our childeren's childeren's childeren's childeren, to "fix" a system that for the majority works? Let's work on fixing the system for the 15-20% of Americans that are currently using the broken system. You know the bankrupt Medicare/Medicaid systems that are already administered by the government.
WoooooHoooooo.
Gotta love that British Universal healthcare.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...l-toilets.html
No, I don't shop for the best deal for my utilities. If there is a massive difference in price, then I would be tempted, but generally when I am responsible for the utilities where I live I get the gas from British Gas, the electricity from whatever the nearest thing to the local electricity board is, and so on. I can't be bothered to shop around for these things. It takes time I would rather spend doing other things and hassle I don't want. Far better the simple option. Likewise when I go shopping - I don't choose solely on the basis of value.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
Gotta love the fact that your choice of source is the paper of choice for unthinking morons.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
The british are unthinking morons? Aren't you from a country that gave us Hitler and you call others unthinking morons?Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Que Cojones!
Well the sad think is that you morons are still multiplying. What are you going to do with your kids - give them to the Islams for canon fodder?? Get real what have you young s done for the world. over populate deplete all the resources, cause global warming, arm rogue nations with nuclear arms.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
you people are disgusting and we brought you in to a pretty damn good world.
Look at you 1/3 of you are gay and incompetent and are cowards 1/3 of you are corrupt and have no integrity, and stretching it 1/3 of you may be a acceptable citizen!!
Get a frreaking mirror and have a look
The daily mail is a red top paper with an agenda to burn. Most educated people understand this and ignore it's opinions.
Vop, a low blow at Germany and Hitler is pretty pathetic. Can't you come up with a decent well thought ouyt reply instead of silly school boy insults?
Fousto, I have absolutely no idea where your rant comes from and how it relates to healthcare. Telling BDunnell to looking in the mirror is slighly rich with your extremest views.
No it isn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by GridGirl
I'm not defending that odious rag, but it isn't a red top.
BBB you are right but I suppose I just view the stuff it publishes as nothing more than a red top with an axe to grind.