I'd say Citroen splits are better, more in real time - http://www.citroenracing.com/en/live...pf=split&car=1
WRC.com splits are up to four minutes behind sometimes.
Printable View
I'd say Citroen splits are better, more in real time - http://www.citroenracing.com/en/live...pf=split&car=1
WRC.com splits are up to four minutes behind sometimes.
That they are late is almost meaningless (compare it to a light from dead star), the fact that they are too often missing splits is more important in my view.
Mikkelsen on top again... Latvala 0.1 faster than Ogier.
133 km/hr average speed on this one...
av. speed 133,2 km/h :)
For me it's just annoying to hear driver at the stage end and on the splits page he still doesn't have time on the penultimate split, not to mention anything about the stage time.
If the splits are that much late, then missing splits aren't that big of an issue. If they'd be on time, then it's another story, in my opinion.
Thanks to both. Both ways aren't really easy to find for somebody who hasn't done it ten times before. I was asking specifically if there is some easy and first sight visible way and sadly I can see there isn't. For em this is another issue with wrc.com. It looks nice but some important stuff like this is quite well hidden...