How can you possibly take the following quote and see it as arrogant?Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
He acknowledges fault in the finding of theists being the same as those of aetheists. He simply states how a theist accepts such faults and deals with them differing from that of an aetheist. One could just as easibly state that any aetheist explaining their grounds for reasoning is arrogant, and I've given examples that much of that reasoning is still second hand or later.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudy Tamasz
As for the assumption that I share such beliefs and wish to justify them, it's simply an incorrect assumption. But I find no reason to insult anyone for their beliefs, regardless of what the basis for them is.