Well I'm sure they've moved on a lot since then. TBH the Fiat hardly troubles the Potenza's and is more limited by its suspension than anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
Printable View
Well I'm sure they've moved on a lot since then. TBH the Fiat hardly troubles the Potenza's and is more limited by its suspension than anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
well to be honest I would have gone for the Conti's myself... they are much better in the wet than the other 3 top tyres in the test (Fred, Goodyear and Dunlop), and as Mark mentioned, your snow (where the Fred is marginally better btw) won`t take long to melt :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Still, way better than then Blizzaks or no Winter tyres at all ;) :D
I guess :p Not going to be doing great distances in the 500 so they should last a while I guess. For some reason I wanted a change from having Pirelli's, Bridgestone's, Michelin's or Conti's like I've always had before as well.
Donkey have you seen those pump sipes they do on Nokians I think?
hehe not close up... nice catchy name, but they look like normal sipes to me :p
I saw them on Youtube. Seemed an interesting idea, not so sure how useful it would be though.
Blizzaks are the tire of choice around here for a lot of people who go with winter tires. In snow, I guess they are quite good and I know a lot of ice racers who run rubber to ice class and they are the tire of choice there too.Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
Donkey, I defer to you being in the industry for the better alternatives.
I would love to know what is the best snow tire that can also tolerate pavement because our winters may involve dealing with snow where my Mother in law lives (she is in the edge of the Georgian Bay lake effect snow belt) but I see mainly pavement down here. Blizzaks I know wear out really quick if they don't see a lot of snow. It is part of the reason I muddle through with an all around all season tire....
True, I guess it's both but I do see the light flashing in the corners so that's not traction control.Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
Why bother? why not just get an AWD vehicle? I'd go for a Subaru if I was living in England and cannot afford a Volvo XC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Just remember VB that AWD vehicles don't handle or brake any better on ice and snow than a FWD car. Plus a Subaru is more to tax, insure, service and run in terms of fuel and tyres PLUS we've already got one Subaru :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
Because that'll probably be around £10,000-£20,000 more expensive than an ordinary car when winter tyres are more like £200 for a set?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
The phrase 'using tactical nuclear explosives to open a bag of crisps' comes to mind :p