No :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Mark
I do miss the days when Ferrari numbering meant something; the 312's, 412T's etc...
Printable View
No :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Mark
I do miss the days when Ferrari numbering meant something; the 312's, 412T's etc...
Me too. I'd much rather see the car called the 248T6 (do they still mount the 'box transversely these days?). I never liked the F(insert year here) naming system. It's generic and boring.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic
Nothing like testing the copyright police :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Which has a similar performance to last year's HRT...Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
And those were not even the actual designations of the machines by the factory....Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic
The look of the the F150 is really starting to grow on me!
http://photos.gpupdate.net/large/168984.jpg
http://photos.gpupdate.net/large/169747.jpg
I sure don't miss the bar code!!
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-conten...ere_2011-7.jpg
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-conten...re_2011-21.jpg
I'm Feeling A Little Verklempt … Talk Amongst Yourselves. ;(
Personally I don't care how innovative the car is...as long it's the fastest :p :
Yep, quite often those visually innovative cars are actually slow. Remember Mclaren from 95 with the middle wing. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by pino
Hmmmmm, the driver didn't fit either which wasn't much help.........Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
Henners thinks McLaren sidepods are beautiful, I think they are pretty ugly. chacun a son gout... or something like that. However, who else's glad the station wagon look's gone? I most certainly am. All cars look better now. 2 years (I think) have gone by and I still don't care much for these disproportionate wings.