What makes a person a citizen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

That remark in fact shows you to be a total and absolute idiot. Are you still

fighting with your brothers and sisters about who is the smartest one? No wait. I expect one of two things to be correct. You are an only child (although you should be mentally an adult) , two /you are the middle child striving for attention but never quite making it.

Riebe, your posts are bordering on the schizophrenic. You in fact may fall into the various subtypes.

The most evident to me is your paranoid subtype. You try to bait people and when you fail you become obsessed with a feeling of persecution so the only way for you to hit back is by resorting to your other subtype of juvenile
tantrums and lashing out with idiotic posts such as the one I, to my embarrassment answering.

You are a deluded self loathing person , unable to converse intelligently with anyone. You are asked questions and refuse to answer. You then resort to name calling. Lest you believe I am calling you names as I write this , I am not. You are most definitely a person I have deep empathy for. I feel sorry for you Bob Riebe as you, amongst all the people that frequent this forum displays a behavior that is at best worrisome. You feel persecuted and can't hide the fact. You divulge your impotence by stating I am not as smart as you. Your thoughts are a maelstrom of disturbance and you can't rid yourself of the constant feeling of persecution when you are unable to answer a question.

By the way, are you a clean person? Do you wash, shave(if you are a man) ,brush your teeth? Do you fall into the blunt or flat areas of the disease.

Ever laugh at the inappropriate? Ever find it funny or amusing or become agitated or giddy at the most inappropriate times?

My main fear for you is your disorganized thought patterns that you display here on a "chit chat" forum for a motor racing site. I enjoy frequenting this place but since you have gravitated to me (another subtype) and try to demean me with hebephrenic enunciation I feel compelled to respond.

I'll give you some hope Riebe since I do not know you, but would hope that one of the moderators would eject you from these forums.

You're not catatonic so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and suggest that maybe,just maybe you are in the undifferentiated Subtype. So, there is hope for you and if you can answer the question posed by me and other questions by many other participants, then I imagine that you are possibly salvageable , but the fluctuations of this illness do not guarantee you anything.

---

Why bother responding to a jibe with an essay? It just makes everyone picture you frothing at the mouth like a loony.

You can get romanian citizenship ( also I have doubts that any of you are interested :laugh :) :

A. By birth
- those who were born on romanian territory from romanian citizen parents

Also:
- those who were born on romanian territory and one of the parents have romanian citizenship
- those who were born abroad from one or both romanian cizitien parents
- those who were born on romanian territory from unknown parents

B. By adoption

C. By request ( stop pushing! :laugh: )


Also, you may become a romanian citizen as " citizen of honour " if you're a foreigner who did important services to our country and nation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gadjo_dilo

C. By request ( stop pushing! :laugh: )

---

Do you have to live in Romania or can anyone get it by request? Now that Finland allows dual citizenship, it could be cool to have a second one.

Sorry Eki but there are 7 conditions and you don't match at least 2 of them:

- to be born and live at the date of request on romanian territory, or even if you weren't born here, you've been living legally here for at least 8 years , or in case you're married and still living with a romanian citizen ( in your case, with a romanian woman :laugh: ) for at least 5 years since the date of marriage.
- is known as having a good behaviour :laugh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gadjo_dilo

Sorry Eki but there are 7 conditions and you don't match at least 2 of them:

- to be born and live at the date of request on romanian territory, or even if you weren't born here, you've been living legally here for at least 8 years , or in case you're married and still living with a romanian citizen ( in your case, with a romanian woman :laugh: ) for at least 5 years since the date of marriage.
- is known as having a good behaviour :laugh:

---

Damn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Countless times you mouth off (not language I usually use) and when

challenged you either can't answer or are unable to. My question to you now is

why do you get involved in a forum if you are incapable of participating?

---

Question goes right back to you. You were posed pretty much the exact same question you posed to Bob in an earlier thread. And, guess what, you gave pretty much exactly the same answer as Bob.

http://forums.motorsport.com/forums/...d.php?t=140661

Post #11

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Keith Olbermann and Beck??? Olbermann at least lives in reality. Beck is off somewhere in cuckoo land as it appears you are too.

---

Post #13

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chuck34

What specifically has Glenn Beck said that is false? How is he in "cuckoo land" any more so than Olbermann? Both men put their (extreme) spin on situations to fire up their respective bases. If you, "glauistean", can not see that these two men are two sides of the same coin, then it is you who needs the reality check.

---

Post #16

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Chuckyboy, watch more than a handful of shows and then give me an opinion.

If for one moment you think/believe (benefit of the doubt given) that there is an intellectual parallel between Beck and Olbermann, then you should heed your own advice.

---

There you go, the "great and mighty glauistean" not answering a specific question. So answer your own question. "Why do you get involved in a forum if you are incapable of participating?"

Sorry to bring up an old thread, but the parallels were just too good to not bring up.

Ok "glauistean" your turn to go on yet another rant about how I'm some sort of paranoid schizophrenic or some other nonsence just so that you can show us all just how "smart" you are because you might have read a psych book once. Hint here buddy, no one is impressed. And anyone with any sort of common sense can see that most of what you try to "diagnose" people with are merely self reflections.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

You try to bait people and when you fail you become obsessed with a feeling of persecution so the only way for you to hit back is by resorting to your other subtype of supposed superiority and lashing out with idiotic posts such as the one I, to my embarrassment answering.

---

Fixed that one for you. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

You are a deluded self loathing person , unable to converse intelligently with anyone. You are asked questions and refuse to answer. You then resort to name calling.

---

Another gem for you to perhaps reflect upon. But you won't. I could go on, but you won't get it so I'll leave it at those two.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by theugsquirrel

Why bother responding to a jibe with an essay? It just makes everyone picture you frothing at the mouth like a loony.

---

Squirrel,

That would be your opinion. However, it was a response to the individual that needed to be seen. It is your choice to read it or not.

It was not an essay nor was it intended to be.

If you read the post and understood what I stated you would not reply with

the "frothing" at the mouth comment which in fact is more reflective of you

than me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

I beg to differ. There is a provision in the Bill. You either have not studied it or care not to.
The president is correct: The House bill contains a section (Sec. 246) titled "NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS," which states: "Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States."

---

There is no provision in the Bill that requires or even suggest a way to check a patients immigration status!!!

None...Zip....Zilch....NADA!!!!

Basically they said No Illegals but you can't check if they are illegal!!!

So explain to me again how he wasn't lying?

Originally Posted by glauistean
That remark in fact shows me to be a total and absolute idiot. I never change

Fighting with brothers and sisters about who is the smartest one? No wait. I expect one of two things to be correct. As an only child (as I am not mentally an adult) , two: am I the middle child striving for attention but never quite making it.

Glauistean posts are bordering on the schizophrenic. I in fact I fall into the various subtypes.

The most evident to me is my paranoid subtype I try to bait people and when I fail I become obsessed with a feeling of persecution so the only way for me to hit back is by resorting to my other subtype of juvenile
tantrums and lashing out with idiotic posts such as the one I, to my embarrassment answering.

I am a deluded self loathing person , unable to converse intelligently with anyone. I asked questions and refuse to answer. I then resort to name calling. Lest I believe I am calling me names as I write this , I am not. I are most definitely a person I have deep empathy for. I feel sorry for me as I, amongst all the people that frequent this forum display a behavior that is at best worrisome. I feel persecuted and can't hide the fact. I divulge my impotence by stating I am not as smart as me. My thoughts are a maelstrom of disturbance and I can't rid myself of the constant feeling of persecution when I am unable to answer a question.

By the way, am I a clean person? Do I wash, shave( am I not a man) ,brush my teeth, the few I still have? Do I fall into the blunt or flat areas of my disease.

I am inappropriate. I find it funny or amusing or become agitated or giddy at the most inappropriate times.

My main fear for me is my disorganized thought patterns that I display here on a "chit chat" forum for a motor racing site. I enjoy frequenting this place but since I have gravitated to me (another subtype) and try to demean me with hebephrenic enunciation I feel I am compelled to respond to me.

I'll have some hope since I do not know me, but would hope that one of the moderators would eject me from these forums.

You're not catatonic so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and suggest that maybe,just maybe I am in the undifferentiated Subtype. So, there is hope for me and if I can answer the question posed by me and other questions by my other bodily member, then I imagine that I am possibly salvageable , but the fluctuations of this illness do not guarantee me anything.

My My.
Riebe, Anthony and Roamy all come charging over my post. To state I am surprised would be totally untrue. To try to minimize what I stated. Well, that is absolute.

To discredit my credentials, well That too is par for the course. People of their ilk are prone to this type of rabid defense of one another and their lack of understanding of what is said is evident in their sad and sorry posts.

Tell you what I'll so for you three. I will let you go ahead with your attempts at discrediting me with your limited knowledge and I will sit back and enjoy with my wife and share the words that are spoken/written by all of you.

Roamy jumps to the defence of someone that does not answer questions and then proceeds to lambaste me. Was the same moral compass applied to Riebe ? No , it was not. You are all perfect examples of what I see on may days and for whomever it was that spoke the gibberish about my ability to converse on the topic I would gladly in a private chat disclose to you my credentials.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

My My.
I will sit back and enjoy me with my wife.

---

Fine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

My My.
Riebe, Anthony and Roamy all come charging over my post. To state I am surprised would be totally untrue. To try to minimize what I stated. Well, that is absolute.

To discredit my credentials, well That too is par for the course. People of their ilk are prone to this type of rabid defense of one another and their lack of understanding of what is said is evident in their sad and sorry posts.

Tell you what I'll so for you three. I will let you go ahead with your attempts at discrediting me with your limited knowledge and I will sit back and enjoy with my wife and share the words that are spoken/written by all of you.

Roamy jumps to the defence of someone that does not answer questions and then proceeds to lambaste me. Was the same moral compass applied to Riebe ? No , it was not. You are all perfect examples of what I see on may days and for whomever it was that spoke the gibberish about my ability to converse on the topic I would gladly in a private chat disclose to you my credentials.

---

Not sure if you are calling me Roamy. If so, you should know I am not. I am chuck34, that is the ONLY name I post under. Seems there are quite a few around here with multiple personalities. That should interest you.

Let's get another thing straight. I DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR CREDENTIALS. You completely missed my point, once again (for someone who is soooo smart you seem to do that quite often) so let me spell it out for you. This is an internet forum about motorsports. Since it is on the internet, you could claim to be anyone you wanted even the most highly degreed doctorate of psychology or whatever you want. And maybe you are, maybe you're not. I don't have any way to prove it, and I don't care. Also, as this is a motorsports forum, psych creds don't matter much.

And one other thing to get straight. I never expected you to actually converse on the topic, as you haven't yet in any thread I've run into you. It always ends with you "diagnosing" someone. Get a new act dude.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chuck34

Not sure if you are calling me Roamy. If so, you should know I am not. I am chuck34, that is the ONLY name I post under. Seems there are quite a few around here with multiple personalities. That should interest you.

Let's get another thing straight. I DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR CREDENTIALS. You completely missed my point, once again (for someone who is soooo smart you seem to do that quite often) so let me spell it out for you. This is an internet forum about motorsports. Since it is on the internet, you could claim to be anyone you wanted even the most highly degreed doctorate of psychology or whatever you want. And maybe you are, maybe you're not. I don't have any way to prove it, and I don't care. Also, as this is a motorsports forum, psych creds don't matter much.

And one other thing to get straight. I never expected you to actually converse on the topic, as you haven't yet in any thread I've run into you. It always ends with you "diagnosing" someone. Get a new act dude.

---

"Always diagnosing someone". Is that so? This NOT a motorsport Forum, rather a forum contained within a motorsport forum. I am, as you can see 34 addressing you.

I would presume/assume/imagine at this time that most people would believe that the Internet is an area where anyone can be anything or anyone they like. Take you for instance. You are a complete and utter sham. My opinion of course.You can't address an issue because you lack the ability. You immediately believe that I am referring to you specifically as implied by your (above) post, when in fact I was addressing three people. You being one of them.

In case you missed something 34, I started this thread and have conversed on it. You have been selective in what you want to respond to. Usually it is when I make a comment after disparaging remarks about some member of government or party. Usually, these comments are baseless as are yours.

As for diagnosing. I don't diagnose. I give opinions when there is a direct and noxious comment made with reference to me.

You being one of the three mentioned I am not going to apologize to you and I would hazard a guess that you would want one.

You want me to be bombastic. I know this. I also know that you care to respond to your idiocy because you want to project to others that read these posts the fact that you are so smart and smarter than me the highly intelligent one of which you have ascribed that label and not me.

So, since you do not care about me or my comments or threads I would suggest you ignore them or my posts. They seem to cause you undue angst.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

"Always diagnosing someone". Is that so? This NOT a motorsport Forum, rather a forum contained within a motorsport forum. I am, as you can see 34 addressing you.

I would presume/assume/imagine at this time that most people would believe that the Internet is an area where anyone can be anything or anyone they like. Take you for instance. You are a complete and utter sham. My opinion of course.You can't address an issue because you lack the ability. You immediately believe that I am referring to you specifically as implied by your (above) post, when in fact I was addressing three people. You being one of them.

In case you missed something 34, I started this thread and have conversed on it. You have been selective in what you want to respond to. Usually it is when I make a comment after disparaging remarks about some member of government or party. Usually, these comments are baseless as are yours.

As for diagnosing. I don't diagnose. I give opinions when there is a direct and noxious comment made with reference to me.

You being one of the three mentioned I am not going to apologize to you and I would hazard a guess that you would want one.

You want me to be bombastic. I know this. I also know that you care to respond to your idiocy because you want to project to others that read these posts the fact that you are so smart and smarter than me the highly intelligent one of which you have ascribed that label and not me.

So, since you do not care about me or my comments or threads I would suggest you ignore them or my posts. They seem to cause you undue angst.

---

Once again everything you try to label me with is very easilly applied to you. For instance, you call me a sham. However, I am not the one who has claimed to be anything. On the other hand you are continually proclaiming how great your psych cred is. That my friend is clasic projection, so I am left to know you are a sham.

Chuck,
repetition is a form of transference and is clinically a form of ontogeneric retardation.
Don't panic and have a hissy fit. Retardation has many meaning in psychiatry and does not imply that you are incapable of understanding. Clinically speaking it is your posts that evade and repeat that shows that you are angered at not being able to summon a cogent thought to express yourself. You use the poster (me) as your means to vent your frustration and use my analysis of you to gain vindication.

Once again, I challenge you to show me one post where I have stated or proclaimed that I have this "great psych cred". It should not be hard to find since you have stated that it is continuous.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chuck34

Not sure if you are calling me Roamy. If so, you should know I am not. I am chuck34, that is the ONLY name I post under.

---

Chuck he is a troll and he is baiting you.
Notice how he starts threads and then abandones the topic to start pointing out others faults, whilst ignoring the topic he supposedly was wondering about.

Don't feed the troll.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

If you read the post and understood what I stated you would not reply with

the "frothing" at the mouth comment which in fact is more reflective of you

than me.

---

Actually I did read your post and understood what you stated, which is exactly why I responded with the comment that I did, thankyou very much.



As for Australian citizenship, I am unsure. However it is not easy for people seeking asylum status to legally gain access to Australia, at all. This is probably moreso true for the US, due to sharing borders with a significantly disadvantaged country.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bob Riebe

Look it up yourself, pay me and I will do it for you, but without money, find it yourself.
If you are too inept, que sera-sera, if you too lazy, tough.

Stick to the thread title, your trolling bs, is childish and boring.

---

You are the epitome of ignorance and hypocrisy. You would be lost if you did not have me to tarnish, or attempt to. You speak in gibberish that only children use and then go along doing exactly what you have chastised me for doing. Now, this is the second post that you have failed to attempt to even remotely address the topic of the thread.

Riebe, you are typical of those that fall into the sad state of the catatonic. You cause me dismay and I worry for anyone that has to endure your endless streams of "look what he just said, bwaaaaahhahhh", let me contact Chuck 34 because he really likes me and will understand what it is I'm saying". I hasten to add that he probably does as no one else could.

By the way, any chance you would one day support your idiotic claims with fact?

Obviously not the bs that's being posted here :confused:
Well maybe third class citizens!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

By the way, any chance you would one day support your idiotic claims with fact?

---

The day after you do, which will also be the day after hell freezes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Chuck,
repetition is a form of transference and is clinically a form of ontogeneric retardation.
Don't panic and have a hissy fit. Retardation has many meaning in psychiatry and does not imply that you are incapable of understanding. Clinically speaking it is your posts that evade and repeat that shows that you are angered at not being able to summon a cogent thought to express yourself. You use the poster (me) as your means to vent your frustration and use my analysis of you to gain vindication.

Once again, I challenge you to show me one post where I have stated or proclaimed that I have this "great psych cred". It should not be hard to find since you have stated that it is continuous.

---

You really should go back and read your own posts. EVERYTHING you try to pin on others really describes you to a T. As such a psychological guy, that should be of interest to to, I would think.

If you don't think you've been proclaiming your psych cred, then I'll reiterate, go back and read your own posts particularly your post 50. You are really getting tiresome. Let's see if you can respond without describing some sort of psychological malady to me. I bet you can't :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

repetition is a form of transference and is clinically a form of ontogeneric retardation.

---

Ontogeneric?

Onto - from the Greek "ontos" and means the existance of
Generic - which comes from the word general and usualky refers to a non-specific or unbranded thing, such as a supermarket's own in-store brand.

Ontogeneric? Sorry, I don't think it exists; unless someone in "Dictionary Corner" thinks is does, you don't get any points and we move to the "Numbers Round"

I'll have 2 large and 4 small numbers please :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rollo

Ontogeneric?

Onto - from the Greek "ontos" and means the existance of
Generic - which comes from the word general and usualky refers to a non-specific or unbranded thing, such as a supermarket's own in-store brand.

Ontogeneric? Sorry, I don't think it exists; unless someone in "Dictionary Corner" thinks is does, you don't get any points and we move to the "Numbers Round"

I'll have 2 large and 4 small numbers please :D

---

Yes, sorry, the term represents a process of development. In his case, it references how gluestem developed into a person who hates the stigma (some form of psychotic desires or disorders such as being both gay and schizophrenic) that he has placed upon himself due to being gay/crazy and unable to accept this fact, so he acts out by attacking others in a twisted attempt at equalization in hopes that these who are attacked will stigmatize themselves. Thus the battle to stigmatize others is actually his personal battle to avoid accepting his guilt that which has become his self created "stigma" for fear that such acceptance would then result in him slipping into a catatonic state where he simply sits and drools rather than frothing at the mouth;

It is a serious disorder and we should all be sympathetic to his desperate situation, as either frothing at the mouth or drooling may damage his keyboard with a massive short that eliminates his ability to froth, troll and drool

:vader:

Excuse me to all of you that have been trying to find the meaning of the word ontogenetic. You, as a result of my hitting the "r" instead of the "t" had to look in vain for the meaning.
As a result I shall remedy the situation and then the post should have more meaning.

Unfortunately, I see that Chuck 34 has not found any post where he claims I have some sort of higher intellect as suggested and stated by me.

I also see that Markabilly has now made the morose tumble into the abyss of insignificance with his prepubescent diatribe that is more suitable to those discovering their sexuality than as a supposed adolescent. This fits exactly into the meaning of the psychiatric diagnosis of those exhibiting stunted mental development.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rollo

Ontogeneric?

Onto - from the Greek "ontos" and means the existance of
Generic - which comes from the word general and usualky refers to a non-specific or unbranded thing, such as a supermarket's own in-store brand.

Ontogeneric? Sorry, I don't think it exists; unless someone in "Dictionary Corner" thinks is does, you don't get any points and we move to the "Numbers Round"

I'll have 2 large and 4 small numbers please :D

---

Rollo, you are quite correct. I have posted an explanation to my error and you were correct to call attention to it. I'm afraid typing while relaxing and trying to do other things is not my forte.

In fact I doubt you meant to spell "usually" as you did, nor do I expect that you meant to spell existence as you did either.

In any event :D to you too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Chuck,
repetition is a form of transference and is clinically a form of ontogenetic retardation.
Don't panic and have a hissy fit. Retardation has many meaning in psychiatry and does not imply that you are incapable of understanding. Clinically speaking it is your posts that evade and repeat that shows that you are angered at not being able to summon a cogent thought to express yourself. You use the poster (me) as your means to vent your frustration and use my analysis of you to gain vindication.

Once again, I challenge you to show me one post where I have stated or proclaimed that I have this "great psych cred". It should not be hard to find since you have stated that it is continuous.

---

ONTOGENETIC refers to development of an an individual in a psychiatric sense. Posted with correction.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by markabilly

Yes, sorry, the term represents a process of development. In his case, it references how gluestem developed into a person who hates the stigma (some form of psychotic desires or disorders such as being both gay and schizophrenic) that he has placed upon himself due to being gay/crazy and unable to accept this fact, so he acts out by attacking others in a twisted attempt at equalization in hopes that these who are attacked will stigmatize themselves. Thus the battle to stigmatize others is actually his personal battle to avoid accepting his guilt that which has become his self created "stigma" for fear that such acceptance would then result in him slipping into a catatonic state where he simply sits and drools rather than frothing at the mouth;

It is a serious disorder and we should all be sympathetic to his desperate situation, as either frothing at the mouth or drooling may damage his keyboard with a massive short that eliminates his ability to froth, troll and drool

:vader:

---

Markabilly. My initial glance at your nonsense was to laugh and say to myself "what an insecure human being this person is" and then I thought about it a little more and realized that there are many people that view these threads and unfortunately,some take what is written by an insecure person such as you are as being profound. They should be made aware, and I will not succumb to having to explain the psychological reasons as to your transparency and your complete and utter ignorance as to certain diseases and sexual orientation of members that participate on these forums.

You don't have to like me, and if you want to call me names like a child as it seems you enjoy I suggest it is more revalent do so in the private chat. I can't help you in your insecurity but I can say with professional sincerity that your post is filled with vitriolic contempt that is so vivid even an untrained premed student could see it.

You combine schizophrenic behavior and homosexuality into one in order to what? There is no correlation between them , but be that as it may, why did you do that? To insult me? I am not insulted. You can call me any name you wish if that is what pleases you , but bear in mind, children and people that are either homosexual,lesbian or bisexual read these posts. People struggling with the terrible mind altering disease that you so cavalierly throw out without consideration are also reading these posts.

So clap yourself on the back Markabilly. You probably have two or three here that will applaud you and your blathering post. I for one have just compassion and sympathy for you and those that think they know you. God help us if you have children.
To keep on topic after reading this I would suggest that a psychological test be administered for anyone trying to enter any country. I know whom I would have a deep and moral dilemma with allowing into mine.

In closing, my mother and three patients of mine are suffering from late stage dementia and Alzheimer's. They are (my mother is not) incontinent. They all, my mother included drool at the mouth and have to be fed. Is that amusing to you Markabilly?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

ONTOGENETIC refers to development of an an individual in a psychiatric sense. Posted with correction.

---

Actually it is a term relating to the biological development of an individual organism, verses phylogeny, which refers to multiple organisms.

Ontogeny is related to developmental Psychology, not Psychiatry.
Psychiatry relates to mental disorders, not normal psychological development which is what Ontogeny deals with.

Perhaps you meant Psychobiology, not Psychiatry.
==============
You told Markabilly, your "patients" were incontinent. If so, drooling is not the problem.

Once again glauistean refuses to take a moment to self reflect on his posts. He demands that I show the post where he claims "psych cred", but refuses to admit that 90% of his posts do that. Every time he trys to diagnose, oh sorry give opinions, he is screaming out "look how smart I am, I know more than you about this subject. And even though it has nothing to do with the thread I starteed, I have "proven" my mental superiority. Therefoe my opinions are "right" on everything. And since you don't agree with my "truths", there must be some form of mental imbalance involved." And for someone with any interest in the human mind, i'd bet his case would be very interesting.

So sad, so predictable. And as I thought, he couldn't respond without diagnosing, excuse me again give opinions, someone. Sure since I directly challanged him, he didn't address me. However in his response to me he drug markabilly in to give him a mental defect.

Challange for you glauistean, can you go a month without responding to anyone telling them there are somehow mentally "off". The only exception is if it actually has to do with the thread. How 'bout it, you up to it?

glaui, on keeping to the general topic of your thread, imagine this forum were a country.
You are an immigrant (you weren't born here and I doubt your parents were chit-chat forumers)...
Are you a citizen of this country?
Should anyone be granted unconditional citizenship simply by posting here?
Wouldn't you expect immigrants to inform themselves about and respect the culture of the country they choose to post in?

In my view you are a bit lacking in the third point. Your blatant disregard for the unwritten customs here (as opposed to many places on tinternet, where constant ranting/trolling/pissing contests are the rule of the land), don't make you a particularly "good" citizen in my eyes. But hey, each his own... I don't have to read you, I stopped even bothering a while ago.
:dozey:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Excuse me to all of you that have been trying to find the meaning of the word ontogenetic. You, as a result of my hitting the "r" instead of the "t" had to look in vain for the meaning.
As a result I shall remedy the situation and then the post should have more meaning.

.

---

It had more meaning with your freudian slip of the keyboard revealing your true disorder as I described and as put forth via herr aliquis.

The speaker had been deploring the fact that the present generation of his people was deprived of its full rights; a new generation, he prophesied like Dido, would inflict vengeance on the oppressors. He had in this way expressed his wish for descendents. At this moment a contrary thought intruded. 'Have you really so keen a wish for descendents? That is not so. How embarrassed you would be if you were to get news just now that you were to expect descendents from the quarter you know of. No: no descendents -- however much we need them for vengeance.' This contradiction then asserts itself [through these actions] setting up an external association between one of its ideational elements and an element in the wish that has been repudiated
(Freud, 1901, p. 14)




You can froth, troll and drool, but you can not hide from your personal stigmas that you see staring back in the mirror....

In other words, forget it, dude, you can not repudiate that which is your base nature no matter how much you try to inflict vengeance upon others in naming and labelling them with your own stigmas in a futile attempt at repression of them from your own conciousness.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by donKey jote

glaui, on keeping to the general topic of your thread, imagine this forum were a country.
You are an immigrant (you weren't born here and I doubt your parents were chit-chat forumers)...
Are you a citizen of this country?
Should anyone be granted unconditional citizenship simply by posting here?
Wouldn't you expect immigrants to inform themselves about and respect the culture of the country they choose to post in?

In my view you are a bit lacking in the third point. Your blatant disregard for the unwritten customs here (as opposed to many places on tinternet, where constant ranting/trolling/pissing contests are the rule of the land), don't make you a particularly "good" citizen in my eyes. But hey, each his own... I don't have to read you, I stopped even bothering a while ago.
:dozey:

---

So why the hell are you posting to me then?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by markabilly

It had more meaning with your freudian slip of the keyboard revealing your true disorder as I described and as put forth via herr aliquis.

The speaker had been deploring the fact that the present generation of his people was deprived of its full rights; a new generation, he prophesied like Dido, would inflict vengeance on the oppressors. He had in this way expressed his wish for descendents. At this moment a contrary thought intruded. 'Have you really so keen a wish for descendents? That is not so. How embarrassed you would be if you were to get news just now that you were to expect descendents from the quarter you know of. No: no descendents -- however much we need them for vengeance.' This contradiction then asserts itself [through these actions] setting up an external association between one of its ideational elements and an element in the wish that has been repudiated
(Freud, 1901, p. 14)




You can froth, troll and drool, but you can not hide from your personal stigmas that you see staring back in the mirror....

In other words, forget it, dude, you can not repudiate that which is your base nature no matter how much you try to inflict vengeance upon others in naming and labeling them with your own stigmas in a futile attempt at repression of them from your own consciousness.

---

That is now the second time that you have used that very same language when informed of the status of a/ my mother and b/ some patients. In future ,refrain from commenting on my threads or posts. I have no regard for you or your complete disregard of decency and compassion.

You used some vague post from Freud to attain some credibility. It does not work as the context if you understood its meaning would be blatantly obvious even to the most dense of the species.

You are inferring a use of Freud but you lack the manners to use the upper case to which the good doctor is surely entitled, to give yourself some points, but the obvious is so glaring that you have absolutely no idea about that which you speak. You are neither an Md nor a PhD. If you were that passage you deem to be of relevance including incorrect punctuation (most unusual) has no relevance and you are wont to believe that you are mastering me by the use of Freud, when Jung would be the more pertinent person to find the information. You must look to the synergy and symbiotic relationships when discussing what you are attempting.
I don't want to see your posts but you will do it anyway. It is my job to know these things and your narcissism and angst which is building to a very repulsive level warrants that you will not miss on the opportunity to spar.

By the way, who wrote the book you are referring to? Are you claiming it was from Freud? Or was it about Freud. In either case supply the answer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by henners88

Yawn.

---

Take a nap.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bob Riebe

Actually it is a term relating to the biological development of an individual organism, verses phylogeny, which refers to multiple organisms.

Ontogeny is related to developmental Psychology, not Psychiatry.
Psychiatry relates to mental disorders, not normal psychological development which is what Ontogeny deals with.

Perhaps you meant Psychobiology, not Psychiatry.
==============
You told Markabilly, your "patients" were incontinent. If so, drooling is not the problem.

---

Perhaps you should stop using google and ask a professional what specific terms mean. In fact, do me a favor and stop posting responses to me where you, like Markabilly fall into the category of dregs of society where you use the disorders of some to poke fun of others. A very sad person you.

A Psychiatrist is a medical doctor Md with a PhD in Psychology. A Psychologist is one who has a degree (PhD) in Psychology. Now Riebe, if you can grasp the fact that there is a difference between the two albeit not very significant you may be able to join in the discussion.
I meant psychiatry. Development includes that of the brain as well as the body. Sometimes, unfortunately, the brain does not develop which brings Psychology and Psychiatry into the question of ontogenetic development.

As for the incontinent remark that you deem funny you should have read on as I stated drooling was also an issue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chuck34

Once again glauistean refuses to take a moment to self reflect on his posts. He demands that I show the post where he claims "psych cred", but refuses to admit that 90% of his posts do that. Every time he trys to diagnose, oh sorry give opinions, he is screaming out "look how smart I am, I know more than you about this subject. And even though it has nothing to do with the thread I starteed, I have "proven" my mental superiority. Therefoe my opinions are "right" on everything. And since you don't agree with my "truths", there must be some form of mental imbalance involved." And for someone with any interest in the human mind, i'd bet his case would be very interesting.

So sad, so predictable. And as I thought, he couldn't respond without diagnosing, excuse me again give opinions, someone. Sure since I directly challanged him, he didn't address me. However in his response to me he drug markabilly in to give him a mental defect.

Challange for you glauistean, can you go a month without responding to anyone telling them there are somehow mentally "off". The only exception is if it actually has to do with the thread. How 'bout it, you up to it?

---

Once again you are evading what was asked of you. If you think I am so smart I will take it as a compliment. The truth of the matter is I have never said a word about being smarter. Because I have studied medicine is a crime to you? That I am aware of biological issues as well as mental and post them is a threat to you. It certainly screams out that you are very insecure and threatened by me. You don't have to tell everyone about this. Anyone with a modicum of intellect can see it.

Post where I have stated that I am smarter than someone else, even you, and that will be that. Don't assume that when a person can speak in depth about neurosis or physical ailments that they believe they are smarter than you. They are only more educated in those fields than you.

Grow up and get some confidence in yourself. In addition I would suggest to you that you read what you write before posting. Thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Perhaps you should stop using google and ask a professional what specific terms mean. In fact, do me a favor and stop posting responses to me where you, like Markabilly fall into the category of dregs of society where you use the disorders of some to poke fun of others. A very sad person you.

A Psychiatrist is a medical doctor Md with a PhD in Psychology. A Psychologist is one who has a degree (PhD) in Psychology. Now Riebe, if you can grasp the fact that there is a difference between the two albeit not very significant you may be able to join in the discussion.
I meant psychiatry. Development includes that of the brain as well as the body. Sometimes, unfortunately, the brain does not develop which brings Psychology and Psychiatry into the question of ontogenetic development.

As for the incontinent remark that you deem funny you should have read on as I stated drooling was also an issue.

---

If you think the difference between a psychologist and psychiatrist is not significant, then you are as ignorant a farce as you seem.

Psychiatry is a branch of science that deals with mental disorders.
You should read your dad's text books more closely or quit trying to use Cliff notes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Once again you are evading what was asked of you. If you think I am so smart I will take it as a compliment. The truth of the matter is I have never said a word about being smarter. Because I have studied medicine is a crime to you? That I am aware of biological issues as well as mental and post them is a threat to you. It certainly screams out that you are very insecure and threatened by me. You don't have to tell everyone about this. Anyone with a modicum of intellect can see it.

Post where I have stated that I am smarter than someone else, even you, and that will be that. Don't assume that when a person can speak in depth about neurosis or physical ailments that they believe they are smarter than you. They are only more educated in those fields than you.

Grow up and get some confidence in yourself. In addition I would suggest to you that you read what you write before posting. Thanks.

---

Chuck, don't feed that troll.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

That is now the second time that you have used that very same language when informed of the status of a/ my mother and b/ some patients. In future ,refrain from commenting on my threads or posts. I have no regard for you or your complete disregard of decency and compassion.

You used some vague post from Freud to attain some credibility. It does not work as the context if you understood its meaning would be blatantly obvious even to the most dense of the species.

You are inferring a use of Freud but you lack the manners to use the upper case to which the good doctor is surely entitled, to give yourself some points, but the obvious is so glaring that you have absolutely no idea about that which you speak. You are neither an Md nor a PhD. If you were that passage you deem to be of relevance including incorrect punctuation (most unusual) has no relevance and you are wont to believe that you are mastering me by the use of Freud, when Jung would be the more pertinent person to find the information. You must look to the synergy and symbiotic relationships when discussing what you are attempting.
I don't want to see your posts but you will do it anyway. It is my job to know these things and your narcissism and angst which is building to a very repulsive level warrants that you will not miss on the opportunity to spar.

By the way, who wrote the book you are referring to? Are you claiming it was from Freud? Or was it about Freud. In either case supply the answer.

---

I did supply the answer but you are too busy frothing, trolling and drooling to see it... :rolleyes:

very unusual as in the freudian sense, it is usually issues with the father, but I see you have instead something of a mother complex, perhaps in the mode of Hitler, for whom it was widely reported that Hitler loved her dearly and cried at news of her death.....the only reported sorrow that he displayed as an adult over the death of a person.

But i think perhaps not, because you are still in angst in striving to avoid your ultimate fate, and are still actively in the repudiation and transference stages


But as to Jung, most interesting you say that, as he claimed to have a great relationship with poppa, but mommie was far more strange, with night time events where her head was chopped off and she was floating around as a ghost at night...and then she would abandon him for long periods dealing with her despondent and demented personality...that caused Jung to conclude women flaws originate from "the innate unreliability of their personalities"

So one can easily deduce from simple logic that the origin of your personal stigmas sprew forth with your mother who must have abandoned you when you were an infant or child, and now abandons you in the final stages of dementia, while you have never been able to repudiate her nor accept her. And now the time is too late to accomplish either.

Then there is the drool that you frequently mention and attempt to cast upon others while seeking the vengenance you sought upon your mother but were denied; therefore, explaining the angry desire to cast your personality and faults upon others, then attack them for being that which you find so repulsive in yourself.

Borderline personality disorders, coupled with some paranoid schizophrenia, show in your behavior and often exhibits such violent transference on to others.

By casting the others as such in the world that you have created, you are now free to disassociate from reality and need not be concerned with the lack of any actual accuracy.

Even more problematic to you is your obvious fear that you will lapse into a catatonic state, to whence once borne, few return




So try not to stare into the mirror and drool, quit being so obsessive over mommie, get a little sunshine, sunshine, and maybe........



well, upon further reflection, naw, you be too :crazy: to be saved

Glauis....I feel what Henners does...YAWN....