Printable View
S2000 I can understand. It offers a chance to get back to something approaching basic Group A regs, thus allowing a wide variety of cars to be competitive. But Group N? Who on earth thinks that Group N cars make exciting, or even mildly interesting, viewing?
Punto S2000 rules (I love that sound too !) :pQuote:
Originally Posted by SUBARUNORWAY1
Also the Pug S2000 is a great car, funny to watch already now. Think about next years... when the speed bar will be raised.
It would be bad if Ford Citroen Subaru Suzuki won't develop a S2000 and quit. Then the change is not good. But all of these 4 plus the new manus, more cars, better :p
Gr. N sucks I must agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helstar
And that allows FIAT to enter WRC world without developping a current spec. WRC car !! :p :
S2000 sucks really hard...
Been to Condroz 06 and 07? 2007 was far better!Quote:
Originally Posted by Wim_Impreza
I love S2000, just hope they find a way to give a bit more torque, cause that would make them even better!
@Corny: been to both, have to say: both were good. But 2006 was a dream which is almost impossible to remake in Belgium...
So we have few years time to experience the majestity and brutal performance of wrc-cars. I suspect that I will not go to spectate for group N likes cars.
Makes me think of '87... From Gr B to Gr A. Well, it wasn't that bad!
Really, I would say it was quite bad, took long time for me to get used to group A, but the good thing now is that the teams has time to adapt.Quote:
Originally Posted by HaCo
Why cant we have 2.5L N/A engines and 4 WD (like Andy Burton's home built Peugeot in UK) for those that dont know this car look hear http://www.peugeot-cosworth.co.uk/ or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkasV_YVvTQ