10 rounds and a limited test program, like maximum 2 testdays for every event.. How about that :D ?
Printable View
10 rounds and a limited test program, like maximum 2 testdays for every event.. How about that :D ?
Name your TEN events! :D
Why are so many countries intersted in hosting the wrc and why are so little manufacturers intersted in competing?
Anyone have a idea??
WRC is interesting to watch, but not interesting to follow :D (hope you can get my point:P)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shifter
Thats not the complete story.
And there is WRC coverage in the US.
I modify it to:Quote:
Originally Posted by Corny
"WRC is not interesting to watch and not interesting to follow"
And now I can get your point :)
a private team leaves... if that means the end is coming then I guess the end has been trying to come for about 30 years but probably drives a Subaru WRC as it hasn't arrived yet... in 1996 we had only 3 manufacturers like now yet the WRC didn't die those years
a 12-14 rounds calendar would be better though
anyone here with a subscription?
http://www.dna.fr/20070506/sport/auto/index.html
I agree.... 12 events calender would be great:Quote:
Originally Posted by jens
1. Monte Carlo
2. Sweden
3. Mexico
4. Portugal
5. Acropolis
6. Safari (Yes, Safari)
7. Germany
8. Finland
9. New Zealand
10. Catalunya
11. Ireland
12. Wales GB
would be my choice of 12 rounds....
what about the gravel stages of PERTH? honestly though can anyone see the FIA DECREASING the number of rallies? They've long talked about reducing costs but increasing rally numbers??? The way things are going we may as well just hold the rallies the way F1 is held; 1 stage 2hrs long whoever gets over the distance fastest wins..............with the number of stages dropped furing Argentina this isn't far off