It's all very well being a smart arse (Which you are exceptionally good at). But what other way am I supposed to interpret that?
Printable View
It's all very well being a smart arse (Which you are exceptionally good at). But what other way am I supposed to interpret that?
Erm, because I nominated the 1988-1992 cars as ones to look at for beauty instead of the 2014 mingers?
Well. Clearly nothing more than an unreserved apology is warranted to dj. There's no doubt I was out of line there.
Fwiw. The post came across to me as he was knocking the 88 McLaren and 92 Williams. I for one think last year's Merc was alright. So I didn't understand where he was coming from. It might be meaningless. But as a token gesture, I've gone and liked 20 random posts of his. When I otherwise wouldn't, because they wouldn't have moved me to do so.
1983 Brabham BT52. Simplicity, no windtunnel, designed by ingenuity and brilliance with an eye for aesthetics too. Gorgeous!
http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&sourc...29628465538347
http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&sourc...29628361068483
http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&sourc...29628343889195
The Lotus 79 and Osella'a suggestion of the Brabham BT52. I think the Williams Fw14b/15c are worth a mention. Mayb they're a little plain? Splitting hairs, but I think the FW19 (JV's winner) was the best one.