I think that applied more to the Andy Rouse race Merkur in the BTCC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Boyd
Printable View
I think that applied more to the Andy Rouse race Merkur in the BTCC.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Boyd
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by FAL
Results at http://rallyresults.org/History/1984...nuals_1984.pdfQuote:
Originally Posted by Neil Henderson
The RED Sierra was termed the '4T' or something similar.Quote:
Originally Posted by FAL
The Sierra RS Cosworth was briefly homologated into Group B so as to allow the model to compete on international rallies, once 200 examples were produced. The Group A and N homologations followed once the production run reached 5000.
It is amazing that Ford did not develop a four wheel drive version of the Sierra RS Cosworth from the outset, it would have been ideally suited for rallying when Group A became the premier class in 1987.
The 2.9 XR4X4 was always going to be too heavy to be effective.
The RS Cosworth was homologated in GpB to permit the 3 1986 Sierra Championship contenders who wanted to to compete in the 1986 RAC Rally. Not sure any other GpB entries were ever made once GpA was achieved not much more than a month later.
The XR4x4 did pretty well on its first event in GpA (87 Monte) - until it was pointed out Ford had not homologated the "option/alternative production" injection (K and L Jetronic) and Blomqvist was excluded. The 2.8/2.9i engine could not be made to develop enough power under the original GpA regs to be fully competitive (I know someone who tried with a Capri...).
Sure there were 2 RED cars - one 2wd before the 4wd one.
Followed by an even better — and very spectacular — performance in Sweden, which would have netted a higher placing had it not been for gearbox problems. That, I think, was the last works XR4x4 outing on a WRC event, the 1987 New Zealand and 1988 Swedish entries being non-works?Quote:
Originally Posted by FAL
I too am surprised it took Ford so long to develop a 4x4 version of the Cosworth. Any ideas why?
I guess the slow momentum (for financial approvals) of Ford as a large company. I forget what Turner says in his book. The Cosworth was very much approved with racing in mind rather than rallying, just as the Lotus Cortina was before it (and that took the best part of 3 years to get an alternative rear end homologated, replacing Chapman's A frame that was no better for racing and a complete and utter disaster for rallying - and road car warranty claims!).Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
From this:
http://www.anwcc.co.uk/FR840310-skip.PDF
the registration was A874VDM.