My new rule of debate

:rolleyes:

Ahh a Canadian - we should copy your bloodbath budget, but because I cba to provide a link that of course never actually happened, shame as it seemed to do the trick in Canada and I'm sure it would work for the UK too.

Schmenke, be prepared to produce your Canadian passport! :p

The best you'll get is my passport photo...

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5020/...0cbedb884a.jpg

^^^ LOL! But we all know you're not allowed to wear hats in PP photos. ;) :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dave B

I'm going to save myself a lot of time and effort by adopting this simple rule. If anybody makes a claim but fails to back it up with a source, I shall simply ignore it. I'm fed up of getting sucked into so-called debate with people who invent or exaggerate data, or make sweeping generalisations.

So "Most Xs are Y" will get ignored, "I read somewhere that most Xs are Y" will attract derision, whilst "60% of Xs are Ys and here's the source" will attract a reasoned debate.

:)

I feel better already!

---

BTW Dave I L.O.V.E your avatar! Down with this sort of thing!

Careful now...

I love my brick!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sonic

I love my brick!

---

That would be an ecumenical matter!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by schmenke

The best you'll get is my passport photo...

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5020/...0cbedb884a.jpg

---

There's a helicocksucker behind us!!