Well it may not have said he was #1 in HIS contract but I bet it was in his TEAMATES contract.
Printable View
Well it may not have said he was #1 in HIS contract but I bet it was in his TEAMATES contract.
I bet you have no proof that it was in his team mate's contract!Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonD
I thought you weren't a betting man.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Funny thread Ioan. Brawn said bla bla bla. Using someone´s words: You wouldn´t see the truth even if God Himself showed it to you.
"Denial is the most predictable of all human responses".... but denying the obvious truth? "we are getting aggravated!"
Ioan, neither does Ross have any prooof given by the qualification of his statement: "It was never written into his contract that I was aware of."Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Well... that kind of proves the point Hawkmoon talked about...Quote:
Originally Posted by Heidfeldrulez
dunno what you're talk about :D but you go there, count all the DNFs of MS ex ferrari mates and then go figure :P or alternatively browse Ferrari press-releases as its a well-known and admited thing that (not always perfectly tested) updates are goin in to the number2 car first (renault did that to fisi all the time) so please stop being a waste of timeQuote:
Originally Posted by Viktory
I see it this way also. MS was such a great driver that he would had achieved awfully lot even without nr 1 driver treatment, but that treatment made him even better and made his team-mates look even worse compared to him. He would of beaten them anyway, but now they didnt have any chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Heidfeldrulez
But hey, its a Ferraris policy, other driver will always be nr 1. And there is nothing wrong with that when the results are what they have been. I believe firmly that as this season progresses Kimi will take that status for years to come.
This is a sure bet! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Firstgear
If we would have talked about SuperAguriF1 than you would have got a point, but believe it or not, Ferrari do have the resources to manufacture 2 identical parts in the same time!Quote:
Originally Posted by Heidfeldrulez
Actually MS had better equipment only 2 times, he had the F2003 GA and the F 2005, earlier than RB. In the first case they only had one full car ready as they were not sure if it was ready, and the second time because MS took the risk to race a not yet ready F2005 earlier than it was due (and we all know that it ended with a hydraulic DNF!).
There was a quote from Barrichello last season where he was stating that there was no No. 2 status in his contract and that he was not given inferior equipment by Ferrari. I already posted it last year so searching for it on the forum should be enough.