Osama Bin Laden Is Dead

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anthonyvop

Trust me.....I wasn't there for you. You were just lucky I was.

I served my country....

Have you?

Didn't think so.

---

I think I've asked before, but were you in the military? Which country did you fight for Tony?

WASHINGTON (AP) — Killing Osama bin Laden was a big victory for the U.S., but how exactly the raid went down is another story — and another, and another.

Over two days, the White House has offered contradictory versions of events, including misidentifying which of bin Laden's sons was killed and wrongly saying bin Laden's wife died in gunfire, as it tries to sort through what the president's press secretary called the "fog of combat" and produce an accurate account.

Press Secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday that officials were trying to get information out as quickly as possible about the complex event witnessed by just a handful of people, and the story line was being corrected.

This is what happens when an administration is founded on lies and damned lies, even good news is turned into pathetic bull-****.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sonic

^^^^ I know you are playing devils advocate but are you really comparing Bin Laden with George W Bush?

---

George W Bush is a greater terrorist than Osama Bin Laden ever was. How George W Bush, Tony Blair etc are not in a world court for war crimes is beyond me. If anyone needed to be killed for crimes committed, its those guys.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anthonyvop

I served my country....

---

Cuba?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eki

Cuba?

---

Nevada!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thunderbolt

dead or alive ?
no just dead
Bin Laden unarmed when killed: White House
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/824...ed-white-house

they should have taken him alive then ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanged,..._and_quartered
electric chair revive electric chair x 3000

---

I can't decide which is more cowardly, to hide behind a woman or to shoot an unarmed man.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bob Riebe

Yes and what of it, leaked intelligence reports say that he was still trying to acquire them.

So you believe wait till they have them AND can use them-- brilliant.

If he had, had them, the death toll stopping him would probably have been higher, although the death toll as it is, was as high as it is, due to incompetence on behalf of the Bush Adm.

---

no no no no my dear Bobby-boy - USA claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, not that they were trying to acquire them. BTW, did you know that CIA funded Saddam for a long period of time?

OK Bob, you are clearly blindfolded and living in your own cinderella world, so it is time for me to stop argueing with you. Bye :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cali

no no no no my dear Bobby-boy - USA claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, not that they were trying to acquire them. BTW, did you know that CIA funded Saddam for a long period of time?

OK Bob, you are clearly blindfolded and living in your own cinderella world, so it is time for me to stop argueing with you. Bye :)

---

And their lap dog Blair claimed with a straight face that Iraq was ready to use the WMDs in 45 minutes. Maybe he was talking about designing an instant nuclear bomb.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eki

I can't decide which is more cowardly, to hide behind a woman or to shoot an unarmed man.

---

Hiding behind a woman for sure <sick>

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eki

I can't decide which is more cowardly, to hide behind a woman or to shoot an unarmed man.

---

Maybe he made a scary face.