Libya no fly zone

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bob Riebe

Compared to this Qadaffi is a pussy cast.

Shiite Uprising & the Marsh Arabs

At the end of the Persian Gulf War in 1991, southern Shiites and northern Kurds rebelled against Hussein's regime. In retaliation, Iraq brutally suppressed the uprising, killing thousands of Shiites in southern Iraq.

As supposed punishment for supporting the Shiite rebellion in 1991, Saddam Hussein's regime killed thousands of Marsh Arabs, bulldozed their villages, and systematically ruined their way of life. The Marsh Arabs had lived for thousands of years in the marshlands located in southern Iraq until Iraq built a network of canals, dykes, and dams to divert water away from the marshes. The Marsh Arabs were forced to flee the area, their way of life decimated.

The support for pushing Qaddafi out is weak if one wants to use his supposed crimes against his own people.
To be for this war and against Bush's cluster-f campaign is hypocrisy.

---

exactly my point earlier.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bob Riebe

Compared to this Qadaffi is a pussy cast.

Shiite Uprising & the Marsh Arabs

At the end of the Persian Gulf War in 1991, southern Shiites and northern Kurds rebelled against Hussein's regime. In retaliation, Iraq brutally suppressed the uprising, killing thousands of Shiites in southern Iraq.

As supposed punishment for supporting the Shiite rebellion in 1991, Saddam Hussein's regime killed thousands of Marsh Arabs, bulldozed their villages, and systematically ruined their way of life. The Marsh Arabs had lived for thousands of years in the marshlands located in southern Iraq until Iraq built a network of canals, dykes, and dams to divert water away from the marshes. The Marsh Arabs were forced to flee the area, their way of life decimated.

The support for pushing Qaddafi out is weak if one wants to use his supposed crimes against his own people.
To be for this war and against Bush's cluster-f campaign is hypocrisy.
--------------------------------------

At the time, it seem that the Libyans who support Qaddafi, have no voice or are irrelevant in the eyes of the babbling politicians.

National Public Radio is finally mentioning those who support Qaddafi, and why.

---

:s ailor: Winning

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bob Riebe

At the time, it seem that the Libyans who support Qaddafi, have no voice or are irrelevant in the eyes of the babbling politicians.

National Public Radio is finally mentioning those who support Qaddafi, and why.

---

To what extent did you care about the Iraqis who supported Saddam Hussein before he was overthrown? Or is your apparent support for Gaddafi based on the fact that Obama is amongst those supporting action against him, which therefore renders Gaddafi worthy of sympathy in your eyes?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by markabilly

exactly my point earlier.

---

Then why did we have to make up a complete bull**** story to take care of him and threaten other countries if they didn't support us they wouldn't get to share in the spoils of war. I watched all UN discussion and I never heard that reason advanced as our stated goal' only bull**** lies, and threats.
Yellow cake u235 jerk-offs sweting through their suites. Pathetic excuse,
Don't fear the truth it will set you free





Winning

I somehow doubt that the rebels got the memo about the ceasefire.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel

I somehow doubt that the rebels got the memo about the ceasefire.

---

Why so?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr Alcatraz

Why so?

---

Because one side can't immediately declare a ceasefire. It's like me punching you in the face on the street and when you're about to hit me back saying "CEASEFIRE!!!!! You can't hit me now!"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel

Because one side can't immediately declare a ceasefire. It's like me punching you in the face on the street and when you're about to hit me back saying "CEASEFIRE!!!!! You can't hit me now!"

---

The reports that I've read is the loyalist's are the ones that have accelerated their offensive. No?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr Alcatraz

The reports that I've read is the loyalist's are the ones that have accelerated their offensive. No?

---

Perhaps my example wasn't the best.

Basically a ceasefire requires the agreement of BOTH sides, not just one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Daniel

Perhaps my example wasn't the best.

Basically a ceasefire requires the agreement of BOTH sides, not just one.

---

Like Duh dude ;)
Can you be more specific. Or is it a simple example of the Anti G^^^^fi forces have initiated a counter-offence. I.ve been too busy watching roumdball
and drinking Vodka to search out what is happing in THE FOG OF WAR