Mosley 'knows' who set him up

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

24th February 2009, 15:41
ioan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knock-on

I don't know. I don't have it.

Lucky us! :p :
24th February 2009, 15:50
Bagwan

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

We only need to take a look at the NoTW website to see how this all works:

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news...OUR-STORY.html

Well now , isn't that the perfect cover for whomever is responsible ?

I might be mistaken , but I seem to recall that she never got the fortune she was promised , and never made a fuss .
When her life was already in a mess , apparently from poor investments , you'd think she might argue that she get what was promised .

Was her name "Patsy" ?

I don't think so .

I think you'll find that she and her agent husband are quite comfortable at this point , having served well .

It will all make for a great story in the end , and perhaps you'll see those responsible for us having this in the news , in their rightful place , as a news item themselves some day .

You might not see the scenario as possible , but you can't argue that it will make a great headline if true .
25th February 2009, 05:17
jjanicke

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tazio

j,

I appreciate that you are very passionate about this subject!

However, we beat (or whipped if you prefer :p :)

the puss out of that dead horse last summer! :dozey:

He won a vote of confidence in June last year! alot of people wern't happy. blah, blah, blah,!!!!!

Not only is he staying, he may run for another term when this one runs out!

Please don't remind me (that he might run for another term). I find it hard to support this guy, indiscretions aside. From my, albeit limited, POV he hasn't had any positive material impact in the last 8 years, perhaps even longer.
25th February 2009, 23:44
PSfan

Quote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSfan

Oh and just something to throw out there. Tazio mentioned a connection between Peter Windsor and perhaps Speedtv backing for the new USF1 team… Well if there is any truth to that, lets continue that idea, Speedtv is owned by FOX… FOX is owned by who again???

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjanicke

PSfan all good points. However I couldn't be more at odds with your last point. Rupert Murdoch is not the head of a governing body , so the comparison is mute.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knock-on

A theory but no real evidence or motive. You could use arguements like this to implicate Ron, JYS and 90% of the paddock!

There was no intention to compare Rupert Murdoch to Mosley or implicate him any more then he already has been. Max also claimed that he hadn't ruled out sanctions to whomever he thought was responsible, at the time, besides maybe cancelling a tow from RM car club services, or limiting access RM's press to the sports the FIA govern how could Max enforce any sanctions against RM?

But now with the USF1 Max may have the means to do just that. And when Peter Windsor says something to the effect that they see teams do things one way, and think they can do it better another way, tells me it opens the door for the FIA to make things more difficult if they want to. Though I don’t believe in this theory because I doubt Max can count on using USF1 to get back at RM and I also think that when he made the statement of sanctions its would be because he already would be in a position to implement them, not maybe in a couple years... which suggests another party involved...

A 2nd possibility is if USF1 is indeed backed by RM, and it also serves Speedtv and Fox`s best interest if there is a successful US team that now RM and MM should learn to get along. In which case Max can scratch RM`s back be making life easier for USF1 in regards to rule clarifications and such, and RM can return the favour by maybe giving Max the little bit of evidence that would make him certain of who initiated this ugly affair.
26th February 2009, 10:14
Knock-on

I half hope he does start a little war with RM.

Max might think he's a big fish but he's small fry in this war. It'll be one way of getting him out of F1 :D
26th February 2009, 11:28
ioan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knock-on

I half hope he does start a little war with RM.

Max might think he's a big fish but he's small fry in this war. It'll be one way of getting him out of F1 :D

Dream on.
Max can have one over RM as long as he has a good legal reason, is the president of the FIA and the FIA is based in Paris, France, where judges aren't impressed by RM in any way.

Max is intelligent enough to only start wars that he can win, as he has proved until now.
27th February 2009, 06:46
ArrowsFA1

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSfan

...In which case Max can scratch RM`s back be making life easier for USF1 in regards to rule clarifications and such, and RM can return the favour by maybe giving Max the little bit of evidence that would make him certain of who initiated this ugly affair.

If that scenario played out then Max would be bringing the sport into further disrepute IMHO. Not because of his private life, but because the FIA Presidency seems to be being used by Max for Max.

Now that Max's private life is public it seems to be in his interest to keep that story linked to his public role as FIA President. It's certainly not in the FIA's interest, or motorsport's interest. So we get the "I know but can't tell" story, and on and on it goes.
27th February 2009, 12:44
Bagwan

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

If that scenario played out then Max would be bringing the sport into further disrepute IMHO. Not because of his private life, but because the FIA Presidency seems to be being used by Max for Max.

Now that Max's private life is public it seems to be in his interest to keep that story linked to his public role as FIA President. It's certainly not in the FIA's interest, or motorsport's interest. So we get the "I know but can't tell" story, and on and on it goes.

So , if a senior official in the governing body of motorsport has people following him around trying to invade his privacy constantly , so as to find something that disturbs the public enough to have him ousted on public opinion , that's ok with you , then ?

Even if it was only about the money , Arrows , it still wouldn't be right .

He'll use every option to ensure this doesn't happen again .

And the next president should appreciate it .
28th February 2009, 05:01
markabilly

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

If that scenario played out then Max would be bringing the sport into further disrepute IMHO. Not because of his private life, but because the FIA Presidency seems to be being used by Max for Max.

Now that Max's private life is public it seems to be in his interest to keep that story linked to his public role as FIA President. It's certainly not in the FIA's interest, or motorsport's interest. So we get the "I know but can't tell" story, and on and on it goes.

Been reading my stuff again????Did you pay for that kool aid ????
Copyright infringement I say!!

I could say BINGO, but you are only saying the obvious, atleast the obvious to those with a bit of common sense...as to the rest, there are none so blind, as those who will not see, or have not been drinking their kool aide
28th February 2009, 05:04
markabilly

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagwan

So , if a senior official in the governing body of motorsport has people following him around trying to invade his privacy constantly , so as to find something that disturbs the public enough to have him ousted on public opinion , that's ok with you , then ?

Even if it was only about the money , Arrows , it still wouldn't be right .

He'll use every option to ensure this doesn't happen again .

And the next president should appreciate it .

As I was saying........get off those drugs and drink your kool aid or you can not have your desert with cool whipping.....NO NOT that cool whipping.

Geeasshes, Halfacaluha
What have you done to these peole tazio???

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page