When will the FIA make a decision over McLaren's appeal?
Printable View
When will the FIA make a decision over McLaren's appeal?
He's already leading the championship, unless you were talking about Massa.. who isnt appealing btw.. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ICKE
You ignored my previous post.. doesnt that sound like a lift at 14 secs to you?
I hope you have had a chance to re-read Anthonyvops post and realise that it is not remotely close to what he was saying...Quote:
Originally Posted by Malllen
Simple translation... Had FIA didn't made a mistake last year by [not]banning[/u] MacLeran, The would be no Hamilton on track to make a 2nd wrong...
I'm inclined to believe there is some relation to Hamilton's 25sec panalty and stepnygate... I think had it been any other team, they would have gotten the benefit of the doubt... MacLeran thanks to last year appears to have lost that priviledge and rightly so...
I'm still not a 100% convinced, but this video make me belive a bit that the punishment was not that wrong,Quote:
Originally Posted by ICKE
And here are two frames from said video:Quote:
Originally Posted by ICKE
Before the Bus Stop -
http://www.geocities.com/rollo75/busstop.jpg
And going into La Source -
http://www.geocities.com/rollo75/lasource.jpg
In both cases Raikkonen is ahead of Hamilton... now where's the advantage? I would have thought that if you were behind someone then the advantage rests with them.
How far should Hamilton have stayed behind? 3 seconds? 5 minutes? Since people are very quick to decide these things perhaps they could enlighten me as to how the Scarlett Ferrari is in front of the Silver Ferrari in this photo if Hamilton gained an advantage by being behind him... hmm.
It was wonderful watching the cars at Spa after the blandness of Valencia and then the brainiacs go and do this.
I want a handful of whatever mind altering party substances must be taken prior to arriving at such a patently stupid decision.
Utterly and totally moronic and unjustified decision from the FIA there. The penalty is supposedly being applied because Hamilton "gained an advantage". Hamilton let Raikkonen past again after cutting the chicane as he should have and then passed him again fair end square. In that move, if anything it was Raikkonen that was out of order as he ran into Hamilton on the exit.
If the FIA rationalize that this supposed advantage is that cutting the chicane got Hamilton any closer to Raikkonen than he was, that is flawed as well as Hamilton was already all over him before they got to that chicane.
For these reasons, this decision to penalise Hamilton is idiotic, illogical and unwarranted and suggests the FIA want to rig the championship so that it goes Ferrari's way.
it may even be the way he was hitting kimi's car before he crashed out.
good to see massa in the wet this time who knows
? 25 seconds (equivalent to a drive through penalty)
i think they should decide this track by track
So basically, with the FIA, justice is not blind? With the FIA, there are different rules for different people and different teams? Basically the FIA is nothing more than a clan of favorites players?Quote:
Originally Posted by PSfan
You're saying that the one sport that I have religiously followed for most of my time on this planet is nothing more than a rigged scam? Well, thanks a lot. Why not just tell me that Santa is some old perv in a red suit?
Eh, don't worry about it. I had my doubts about Santa anyway. But what's sad is that you don't seem to see anything wrong with the premise that the FIA is nothing more than a gang of small time thugs that take revenge based on the past. Interesting. Sad, but interesting.
did lewis let kimi pass or did kimi have the speed to pass him?Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Lowndes
i guess they would have looked at the speed lewis was doing when kimi pased him
it may all so have to do with how far he was behind kimi before he cut the chicane and how far ahead kimi was
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/...37_468x286.jpg
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/oth...verturned.html