Well, top class... definitely not on gravel :-/ so I don't count them to the "Hanninen-Meeke-Mikkelsen-Atkinson-... class"Quote:
Originally Posted by urabus-denoS2000
But we're really in a wrong thread with this, I believe... so I better stop here.
Printable View
Well, top class... definitely not on gravel :-/ so I don't count them to the "Hanninen-Meeke-Mikkelsen-Atkinson-... class"Quote:
Originally Posted by urabus-denoS2000
But we're really in a wrong thread with this, I believe... so I better stop here.
One more off topic post.
I think there is room for two different series and as Mirek said, two series gives more to follow and more to watch. Also IRC is an opportunity for drivers that don’t have that much money or sponsor to do a full WRC, PWRC or SWRC serie.
What I’ve liked with IRC is that I can watch rallies in different countries and different kind of stages compared to WRC which mainly runs in the same countries and stages year after another.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FabiaFan
ERC definitely isn't about driving on gravel ;)
There was at least one gravel round... ;-) They all participated... and look at their results... but OK, wrong cars (in case of SJJ and GB)...Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirek
Going back off topic, I'm not sure that Rallying can really properly support 2 'International' series, it's just not big enough.
If the people who run the WRC had done their job, the IRC wouldn't have been needed, but as we know, they took their collective eyes off the ball. Into the breach came the IRC. What we got was different types of events, night stages, more competition - then the Monte!! And still the WRC sat back.......
I want ONE International Rally series - with lots of Manufacturers, drivers who can win, different event formats, good media exposure, etc
Yes, I'm living in a dream world.
mmmmmm...... Pug 207 .....
Did he drive 3 different 207's?
Solberg C4 for sale
http://handbrakeshairpins.wordpress....roen-c4-wrc-2/
One Xsara as well for sale !
Which is about less than 150mb of partial pressure of Oxygen at 3000m compared to a theoretical 212mb at sea level.Quote:
Originally Posted by OldF
I am a diver with limited knoledge of Turbo engines but aren't those figures only valid for NA engines because a Turbo engine design offers some compression compensation to that loss ?
Then what would be the actual altitude loss ratio compared to a NA engine ?
Accoring to Swedish media Petter has applied and has been accepted, but has been given a suspension on team name, PG Anderson is also chasing a drive in Sweden, but have to have his name in by tomorrow morning.
Good to get Petters name in there, would not be the same without him !