Last year it was hit & miss with DMACK. Sometimes very good, some other times very bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis44
Printable View
Last year it was hit & miss with DMACK. Sometimes very good, some other times very bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis44
But if they are too stiff in icy conditions, there can be a massive difference. Watch the next facebook live if you can and see just how little traction he has when accelerating. It is incredible. You could visibly see Mikkelsen was faster.Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis44
The dmacks were good on certain gravel rallies. Nowhere elseQuote:
Originally Posted by Francis44
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
On gravel.. Evans is no Ogier but he's not as bad as these times show.Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis44
Re: Mikkelsen, it doesn't appear to have occurred to many that he may have preferred to wait for a Polo 17 than compete on DMack.
Astier with 208 r2 clearly faster from Porsche 911 gt and Delecours 124 rgt.
just because some they were asking before the rally about their speed.
Hanninen's tree
WRC freak @FakeHinkelstein 43m
43 minutes ago
More
@Loeb_Seb1 just landed in a chopper to spectate SS7. @AMCRallyResults #wrc
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2nsdmnXcAEUYnh.jpg
Mikkelsen
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2n2XQxWIAAbHqj.jpg
I think it would be better for Dmack company only to provide the stickers for the car and enough money for M-Sport to let them buy Michelin-tyres.
In this case it is a totally negative publicity even if the rosd tyres are not really bad.
Again no splits for Seb?