The Ferrari thread !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bagwan

I've met Felipe , and he's a mouse .

---

A mouse who almost died racing yet he came back and continues to race, interesting eh?!

Anyway, he's a very very fast mouse who's not afraid to go racing, and that's what counts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bagwan

I've met Felipe , and he's a mouse ..

---

He is a mouse, Sir Maxamillion mouse,

and he comes from a long long long long long long line of......

Bullfighting mouses.

Ole!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ioan

A mouse who almost died racing yet he came back and continues to race, interesting eh?!

Anyway, he's a very very fast mouse who's not afraid to go racing, and that's what counts.

---

Speedy Gonzales? :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by henners88

Oh come on the facts don't suggest that when the ruling wasn't reversed and the fine stayed in place.

---

:eek:

You naughty, NAUGHTY boy!

:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

Speedy Gonzales? :D

---

:D ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tazio

Come on!
Tell us what you really think! ;)
BTW who was this guy?
I guess we will never know as he is still banned :s ailor:

---

FWIW Steve2009 was permanantly banned for an attack on StD.
A true Forum Martyr! :s mokin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SGWilko

Understood, and rightly so. But, if a certified food handler who felt they 'had' to leave your restaurant for not cleaning round the rim, I suspect that, a tribunal case would not work in your favour.

A cleaner in that position may well not have good grounds, but someone trained for food prep is NOT a cleaner.

---

No , clearly not understood .
The job description includes that function .

You know little of the case , yet continue to cast a shadow on a very clear issue .

I wonder now if you are capable of relating the analogy to this Ferrari issue at all , when originally , I was more thinking you were just dodging the matter entirely , by fixating on the toilet talk .


It's a good thing that Felipe did , eventually , decide to act for his team .
He has his seat because of this , and this only .

If he had not had the sentimental factor in his court , he would not have been treated as kindly , I'm quite sure , especially as he cost his team a hundred G$ .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ioan

A mouse who almost died racing yet he came back and continues to race, interesting eh?!

Anyway, he's a very very fast mouse who's not afraid to go racing, and that's what counts.

---

He might be fast if he wasn't pouting so much .
That lower lip protruding isn't very aerodynamic .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bagwan

No , clearly not understood .
The job description includes that function .

You know little of the case , yet continue to cast a shadow on a very clear issue .

I wonder now if you are capable of relating the analogy to this Ferrari issue at all , when originally , I was more thinking you were just dodging the matter entirely , by fixating on the toilet talk .


It's a good thing that Felipe did , eventually , decide to act for his team .
He has his seat because of this , and this only .

If he had not had the sentimental factor in his court , he would not have been treated as kindly , I'm quite sure , especially as he cost his team a hundred G$ .

---

Ferrari cost themselves a fine, due to the fact that they manipulated the drivers changing position. After creating a handicap for Massa, they declared Alonso quicker and made it clear that Massa was to yeild the position.

As for your restaurant, fully accepting that your job decription does cover all normal activities such as cleaning, you still aren't making the proper comparison. If you fired an employee for failing to execute a direction that would be in violation of food handling regulations, do you think that would somehow exempt you for being fined for the violation taking place?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bagwan

No , clearly not understood .
The job description includes that function .

You know little of the case , yet continue to cast a shadow on a very clear issue .

I wonder now if you are capable of relating the analogy to this Ferrari issue at all , when originally , I was more thinking you were just dodging the matter entirely , by fixating on the toilet talk .


It's a good thing that Felipe did , eventually , decide to act for his team .
He has his seat because of this , and this only .

If he had not had the sentimental factor in his court , he would not have been treated as kindly , I'm quite sure , especially as he cost his team a hundred G$ .

---

You brunged up the WC comparison, not me.

And as it was, Alonso was only able to demonstrate his 'superior speed' due to being on a different engine map.

I'd say that's hoodwinking.

Fact is, Massa chose to continue to RACE, I always thought that was what racing drivers were paid to do?