WELL if that is the case then lets just let the foxes kill all of the sheep, so then you are happy. :dozey:Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
Printable View
WELL if that is the case then lets just let the foxes kill all of the sheep, so then you are happy. :dozey:Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
They don't kill them all, just about 5% like you said. Foxes have to eat too, you know, and they can't be vegetarian because their digestive system isn't built that way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown, Jon Brow
But then because, the farmers can't make any money out of sheep because they are 'not-essential', they would not breed any more so they could use the land for cattle or crops instead. Sheep would die out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
True. But it doesn't make it right. They could keep them as pets or to prevent grass and other vegetation from growing too tall. In Finland, some keep sheep as a hobby and they are also used to take care of historical and cultural landscape for tourists and museum purposes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown, Jon Brow
And who'll pay for that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
As I understood, foxes eat mainly rabbits anyway so sheep dying out wouldn't affect them much.
This dying out thing makes me wonder, where were sheep before humans started domesticating animals?
They were wild, but there are hardly any wild sheep in England anymore. The farmers would most likely not breed anymore or kill them so the land could be used by other farm animals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Erki
but why would anyone want to reduce the number of a species so they would become close to extinction.
people themselves if that's a hobby, and taxpayers and visitors if it's for cultural and historical reasons.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown, Jon Brow
I have a better more sustainable method.
I call it farming ;) -the process of producing food, feed, fiber, fuel and other goods by the systematic raising of plants and animals.
I agree with the ban...killing any animal for pure enjoyment is wrong..