Yeah but that was Citroen and FIA is Fre... hey wait! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ville
Petter got excluded last year, he were missing something like 3kg of muck in the wheel arches...
Printable View
Yeah but that was Citroen and FIA is Fre... hey wait! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ville
Petter got excluded last year, he were missing something like 3kg of muck in the wheel arches...
8 pages for WRC in GPWeek.. that was a good event :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by HarriK
Does it make a difference? In both cases the part was different in reality than in a document. Also in both cases team did not benefit from this.Quote:
Originally Posted by sollitt
Then Sweden 2012. Proton used lighter suspension arms than homologated. They got 2 minutes penalty and a severe reprimand.
Well you could benefit from having a stronger cluch in this event, ask Petter..
Re Mikko - I reckon this is the FIA trying to make it a competitive championship by helping the Fords after they made a total hash of capitalising on Loeb's demise.
Tiny differences in the clutch & turbo do not deserve disqualification.
Why need a homologation then? Of course it deserves some kind of penalize.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
Manufacture, not driverQuote:
Originally Posted by Rallyper
if he said such a thing i think it is not professional...Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
Rules are there to be obeyed... It was in Citroens hands to be 100% legal and not to give the FIA any reason to doubt them...
The driver won in an illegal car, it has to be disqualified.Quote:
Originally Posted by uranium
I understand FIA has been a bit easy in some similar problems in the past but disqualification is the only way to go.
Conspiracy theory no. 1Quote:
Originally Posted by Janez