Sordo and Tänak https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mVp...ature=youtu.be
Printable View
Sordo and Tänak https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mVp...ature=youtu.be
And here it is, the new road-going Yaris, based on the existing Yaris.
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-new...armer-in-2017/
Nice to see a a 'hot' Yaris for the road, tying the WRC campaign together.
Paddon
https://youtu.be/rntaY8xLs1Q
still no vids of Tänak?
Not really, hot hatches are kind of promotion for a car model but they are rarely profitable. Anyway the others at least look good. This car looks like a something from a village tuning party.
So is for plenty of totally uniform cars. You have to see that the numbers of sold hot hatches are very small while the expenses for their existence are rather high. It's the common models which make money while the hot hatches make the promotion.
:-)
I am driving Focus ST 2008 version and its pretty perfect.Nice and fast.Pretty fun to drive.
But Mirek is right
same who bought the thing below...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...t_20100515.jpg
Paddon
https://youtu.be/v130W4WOQj8
What a monster rear wing. That Yaris a least looks like the most complex aero wise car.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C19xzQlXEAA-Wkh.jpg
Yaris hot-hatch looked better in a sketch than in reality..
http://images.car.bauercdn.com/pagef...ris-sketch.jpg
Paddon
https://youtu.be/TtN9EIi_HVA
one more of Paddon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV2UxMWjAgA
2 mins of Sordo from Zagatoi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kw4qDktRItk
Paddon today
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2Cv9i0W8AATgnf.jpg:orig
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2CwCdWXAAYiopf.jpg:orig
I don't work in automotive sphere, but here I feel duty to express engineering pov. Rear wing is meant to generate downforce, stability... it is its purpose. It is not meant to be married or even just desired. So its form is defined by certain phisical characteristics of airflow and not "being atractive". If I find an analogy in nature it is like comparing an owl and a rose... one is aerodinamic the other beautifull in its purpose.
I am fully aware of this... It is about managing air flow and creating as much leverage on the rear wheels as possible.
Still doesn't make it pretty though. I liked the first iteration of their rear wing... This, however, not so much.
... Also owls are majestic creatures. The Toyota is not.
Ogier from michelin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9P-...ure=youtu.be&a
Yes it is ugly, but designed to work in conjunction from the front wings back. Since shots of Ogier testing the Yaris, it is evident that the door skins have been widened, and sculpted similar to an 80's testerossa, flat at the top which leads from top of front wing, the aero door mirror arms, along this top edge of door skin and rear quarter panel to the bottom of the rear wing.
The car does seem to look stable at speed on Tarmac straights.
https://youtu.be/6dOmJuECGVM
Ogier test from Zagatoi....
Lot of understeer i think.
Στλθηκε απ το LG-D802 μου χρησιμοποιντας Tapatalk
Paddon
https://youtu.be/rWJA8qNOgkQ
small clip from Evans,nothing special,but the view with the winding snow is magic.
https://youtu.be/wJmlHELwCSM
Tidemand
https://youtu.be/zprOXY3ILBE
Let's take it different way. Both oversteering and understeering are negative behavior. It's not like there are only two options, the good one is neither one of them. Understeering is for sure the safer bad thing as it is easier to predict especially for amateurs and it also secures better way of crashing (by front) but I somehow doubt that the general rule applies also for WRC drivers.
Anyway on ice with short studs or without studs at all I think that every 4x4 car sufferes from some understeering at the apex and oversteering at the exit simply because of very low level of grip (I admit that my only experience with studs on ice is from go-karts but with them the behavior was exactly like that - understeering at the apex becoming oversteering at the exit).
That's weird video.
recover after Ogier broke rear wheel
https://youtu.be/rLP2q28J9ms