So no-one knows who is better for developing the Toyota, but we've given our opinions in favour of Latvala.
Who has an opinion on Mikkelsen being better than Latvala for car development and why ?
Printable View
So no-one knows who is better for developing the Toyota, but we've given our opinions in favour of Latvala.
Who has an opinion on Mikkelsen being better than Latvala for car development and why ?
Molly faster than Serderidis ;)
Hyundai Motorsport @HMSGOfficial · 8s9 seconds agoQuote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
SS3 #Paddon: "When it got twisty we struggled for grip with the hard tyres at the front. It wasn't too bad." #WRC #RallyAustralia
(20 - Sordo Dani / Martí Marc): There is a line, but it's not super clean. On the soft tyres there's not so much grip. Hard tyres would have been better, I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
Rare, if ever, i've heard him complain about setup? Quite common for latvala.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
Sent fra min XP7700 via Tapatalk
Mads ss2
https://twitter.com/scottyn86
damn, shame about this car problem for Tänak, hoped a little more in the morning loop...ok still a long rally to go
I don't think there is a very big difference between latvala and mikkelsen regarding who's best for developing the toyota. I can imagine they both have the experience needed for development. So that leaves us with who is the best driver. And after this season thats pretty clear, its Mikkelsen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
If that's true, the teams would have only one driver for development, so I doubt it, can I?Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by stefanvv