Originally Posted by
denkimi
i don't know what you are trying to say. your stage analysis proves exactly what i'm saying.
on day 1 he was 17 seconds faster than everyone besides loeb, on day 3 he was 37 seconds faster than everyone besides loeb.
and on day 2? 5th fastest, losing 30 seconds to everyone besides loeb. even without his offs, he still lost 14 seconds to gronholm.
his times on day 2 were clearly slower than those on day 1 and 3. coincidentally he was slower when he was a threat to loeb, and faster when loeb was uncatchable and he was a threat to loebs challenger gronholm.
i could very well be coincidence, but as mintexmemory said, similar story's are being told about sordo, ogier and solberg.