WRC mainclass from 2027

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kenneth

It totally is long term solution, more so when the regs are designed for future flexibility in mind.

Rally2 sourced engine is just fancy phrasing for road-car derived engines, which is imo important.

---

I'm open to the spec, in the same way that the body has to be within the set volume.

But disagree that it has to go through group A first, 2,500 examples etc, when it's only the block being used - just a lump of metal - and road designed displacement is often ignored anyway as everything that bolts to it is made for purpose as it all transforms into a racing engine! With 10% by 2035 and manufs divesting their engine building because they don't want to be associated with them, the pool of potential suppliers is too small and the wrong crowd. And if a Horse can supply an engine (like it is supplying that Chevrolet a few pages back), why can't a pony provide engines that are built for purpose? That's the philosophy of all this.

It doesn't make sense. And market forces work so much better than cost caps on a very small group of disinterested suppliers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EstWRC

Nice try

First of all, they aren’t my big names, they are most known I saw on the entry list, don’t care if they are there or not

Second of all, yeah let’s make conclusions already based on qualifying stage.

Third, this is off topic anyway

---

Not trying anything just replying and you were discussing it in this thread.

PS. The two 'names' arent even in the top 10 on SS1. The rally is competitive.... like WRC 27 should be.

PPS. Vaher fastest on SS1... you wouldnt like this possibility in WRC ?