Anfield was quite close, but not quite within 50, but it was close enough
Anyway I am sure I have read this recently.
I want to say about 1,750?
Printable View
Anfield was quite close, but not quite within 50, but it was close enough
Anyway I am sure I have read this recently.
I want to say about 1,750?
I'm confused :crazy: . What question are we on? :p:
Bridges on the Trans-Siberian line.
Don't need to too exact, to the nearest 100 will do fine!
To avoid confusion I'll repeat my guess of 10,000 bridges crossed by the trans-Siberian Railway.
Sorry D. I must have missed your guess amoungst the other erm confusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Type
10,000 is a wee bit too high.
Really! the railway is 9,289 km (5,772 mi) long and that's approximately 1 bridge per kilometre. Or is the statistic you have only for major bridges?
The info I have simply states that there are ---- bridges on the Trans-Siberian railway.Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Type
Here is a direct quote from the info site I use (with the number crossed out :))
Trans-Siberian railway crosses exactly ???? bridges
I think the problem arises where the railway divides off into 3 different routes
*Moscow-Vladivostok *Moscow-Ulaanbataar *Moscow-Beijing
My source was answering for the Vladivostok route alone :(
So if you take all three routes into account the answer would be close to 10 000
what happened here?
Howzabout 6500 bridges?