One thing you will soon realise with this forum is that, in nearly all cases, Roamy (aka Fousto) is wrong :DQuote:
Originally Posted by The Black Knight
Printable View
One thing you will soon realise with this forum is that, in nearly all cases, Roamy (aka Fousto) is wrong :DQuote:
Originally Posted by The Black Knight
Except in this instance ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by barryfullalove
So I'm not allowed to say that Ryan Giggs was alledgedly knobbing Imogen Thomas, but you are happy to bodly make the accusation that "MS cheated his way to 7 championships"? :D Double standards if you ask me :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
:laugh: No of course he didn't cheat. But the argument that another driver could have won the championship in the Ferrari from 2000-2005 has some merit.
Yeah but saying Damon Hill could've won is a bit too far.....for a start Rubens would've beaten him ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
Nurse, you forgot to give Fousto his medication this evening :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by Roamy
Yes he cheated. As Bernie mentioned in his book, " they all cheat in F1, just the stupid ones get caught!"Quote:
Originally Posted by barryfullalove
I'm sure one could argue that with regards many drivers championships. Plenty of drivers could have won in the 1998 and 1999 McLaren, or the 92, 96 Williams, 1988-1989 McLaren etcQuote:
Originally Posted by Mark
In fact, for every championship Ayrton had I could say definitely that had you put another driver in the car they could have won it. Does that then devalue his championships? Nope. Likewise it doesn't devalue Schumacher's either.
Button might also like to get down on his knee's to whoever decided to activate the DRS. Without the abomination that is the DRS, Schumacher may have held on to at least one of the podium places but with it, he was absolutely no chance. Button may not have worked his way from last to first without the abomination that is the DRS either.
The abomination that is the DRS may give us lots of overtaking, Yay, but it removes any chance of a slower car defending against a faster car which is the circumstance that provides truly great racing
Now, can we finally get rid of this pox on F1 once and for all.
Did that help JV in the past?Quote:
Originally Posted by Roamy
Sure, sure, that's why Rubens didn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by The Black Knight
No way they will remove DRS it's been voted to stay beyond 2013. :\Quote:
Originally Posted by Whyzars
And we can add 2009, and 2010 to those championships as well, and if Red Bull, er Vettel goes on to win this years championship as well.Quote:
http://www.motorsportforums.com/imag...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by The Black Knight http://www.motorsportforums.com/imag...post-right.png
I'm sure one could argue that with regards many drivers championships. Plenty of drivers could have won in the 1998 and 1999 McLaren, or the 92, 96 Williams, 1988-1989 McLaren etc
In fact, for every championship Ayrton had I could say definitely that had you put another driver in the car they could have won it. Does that then devalue his championships? Nope. Likewise it doesn't devalue Schumacher's either.
:up:
:wave: Thanks :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Not bad for a pensioneer.
McLaren wasnt even the best car in 1990 or 1991 so how could another driver have won it? Berger was a good driver, but he didnt win (he was at least as good as Mansell)Quote:
Originally Posted by The Black Knight
I hope you are joking?Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
2000 Ferrari wasn't even the best car either so how could another driver have won it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
Apply your answer to above post.
You answer it.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Black Knight
I just did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
No bother - 42.651% of all statistics are made up! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by pino
:p : But only 291.4% of people believe that.Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
For once the majority are right :D 70 plays 68.
71 plays 68 :)
I voted a few weeks back finally and said no he should not retire. If he is still enjoying it and he has a team that wants him, he should stay in it.
I was glad to see him do well in Canada and it's a shame he didn't get on the podium. And though some people will say this proves he still has it, he is beating Rosberg, etc, consider this.
With his excellent race in Canada he is 1 point ahead of Kobayashi.
That might say more about Kobayashi than Schumi.Quote:
Originally Posted by airshifter
Looks like Mercedes want him to stay, and there is even a chance that there will be a contract extension:
autosport.com - F1 News: Haug hails Schumacher's performance
Fousto's nightmares continue! :D
I do find Mercedes' attitude towards Schumacher curious. The desperation to defend him goes beyond anything I can recall. One good performance and suddenly he is Mercedes' man for years to come, apparently, as though no other drivers of calibre will materialise during that time. And, as much as I have always had much time for Norbert Haug, his comment that Schumacher's race in Canada was him 'at his best' is quite laughable. He drove very well, certainly, but by the standards of his comeback, not his best during his years of dominance.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
:laugh:
12th to 2nd withing a dozen of laps in wet conditions, then defending in the dry against DRS enhanced competitors with better cars on a track with 2 DRS zones one of them very very long in a dog of a car it's great performance and Haug knows it well.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
I think what ben is saying is that the Schuey of old would have won.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Impossible, you can not defend against cars that are 1 second a lap faster anyway and also have DRS advantage for almost 1 km/lap. You all know I would have loved it to see him do it, but I knew it that it will not be possible, still great driving from MS, he gave his team some hopes for the future.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
One thing that showed Schumacher is still complete with his race brain was after the last restart. On all 3 or 4 previous restarts everyone fell miles behind Vettel and were left for dead.
On the last one, Michael stayed right with Vettel and went down the outside. He got that just right.
Personally I think back in the day Schuey would have won. Just my opinion Ioan :)Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
There's a reason why they always feared him when they saw the Ferrari in their mirrors! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by aki13
Sure in the days when there was no DRS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
I don't think when DRS was activated, that Michael had a chance of finishing anywhere other than 4th. DRS made Button and Webber almost certain to pass.
I found myself cheering for Michael in Canada and during his first career I couldn't stand him. Weird, ain't it? I wonder if anybody else feels the same?
I was reeeeeeally annoyed when I realised he wouldn't be on the podium. You could see it in Michael's eyes too, he was bloody sad.Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
Quote:
http://www.motorsportforums.com/imag...quote_icon.png Originally Posted by aki13 http://www.motorsportforums.com/imag...post-right.png
One thing that showed Schumacher is still complete with his race brain was after the last restart. On all 3 or 4 previous restarts everyone fell miles behind Vettel and were left for dead.
On the last one, Michael stayed right with Vettel and went down the outside. He got that just right.
I think he was the only one who actually came close to overtaking, vettel, if he was in a car which was not as slow, he perhaps could have done it.
Well do we know how quickly does a human body looses its ability to be at the maximum, in any sport, if any person, goes off for a while, it takes a while to come back to the same level, we are looking at someone who went out of F1 for 3 years, and then came back in a car which was not to his liking. So if he actually took say a year and a half to find even 60% of his old self, thats not bad at all, and we really dont know how much of a equal he is if we compare to how he was in Brazil 06. In my opinion even in Monaco, he was doing very well, perhaps now he is now getting comfortable in the car. In the past he was in a Ferrari from the time it was conceived till its very end, I mean a car year after year designed very closely to what he would like, Mercedes w01 was no where close to that, but he was still competitive in it, he was still very close to rosbergs times. I think he is more comfortable with this car, and I dont think Nico was doing as well as Michael in Canada or Monaco at any stage. I dont think we are being fair in comparing him with his old performances, when he was in competitive racing since a child.Quote:
So whats happened to Schuey? We're repeatedly told by the team and his fans that he is as fit as he ever was and his age is not a factor. Back in the day we were used to him being able to outdrive a car and drag it beyond where it deserved to be, yet he's struggled for one and a half seasons? His drive in Canada was mighty impressive and was the best since his comeback IMO, but not every race is going to be wet from now on. Rosberg has shown the pace of the car in the dry and its DRS is possibly the best on the grid. Why is Michael unable to take advantage of these factors? Tyres can't be an issue because he's changed tyre manufacturers more times than half the grid have had hot dinners. He's had over a year to develop his current car so whats missing, Rory Byrne? I hope he continues to improve but I had hoped he'd be mixing it up at the front abit more often by now. :)
this year schumi is better because of one simple reason.mercedes is better