Hehe, there are some forum members who saw me and PLuto together so we are two, yesss :D
Printable View
Hehe, there are some forum members who saw me and PLuto together so we are two, yesss :D
Are you sure? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirek
Kostka was betting all the season to start on Deutschland, where he wanted to show how fast he could be in WRC...Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
So the next logical step is to win Barum ;)
so why he won t start?Quote:
Originally Posted by PLuto
As Pluto said, because FIA doesn't give him a fair chance to make a good result... If you have to start behind all the others, you lose lots of time because of the gravel/dirt thrown onto the road in cuts. So why ruin your reputation (being slower than he should be) and spend a lot of money?Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
maybe he has overestimate himself i would say if this is the reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by tommeke_B
Excuse me here. I need to see black on white (or pixels on the screen) that Kostka really would've had to start there where he was on the entry list. Where's the logic? Foe example in Finland Tahko started among WRC crews and his participation to an FIA WRC event didn't differ to Kostka's plan. Same with other WRC one-offs as I recall. So, what's really the story?
Also in Sweden earlier this year non priority WRC drivers were starting inbetween WRC and WRC2 crews.
@Hartusvuori and Pucky52, yes... But those also had a number between WRC and WRC2. ;) From what I know it happened more that FIA let "unproven" drivers start behind all the others, even with a WRC car. I remember 2007-2008 where several Dutch drivers were driving WRC cars and ended up starting around number 50-60 I think. And yes, in WRC, Kostka is "unproven". His outings in Barum were Always good, and his prestations in the Czech Republic are remarkable, but apparently FIA didn't bother putting him where he belongs... It makes no sense, but there are more things that make no sense in the world of WRC...