Hey, I am one of those two. And you will address me as Mr Fool or you will have your eyes plucked out :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by markabilly
Printable View
Hey, I am one of those two. And you will address me as Mr Fool or you will have your eyes plucked out :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by markabilly
Billy, I can see the words on the screen - but it's all just noise.....Quote:
Originally Posted by markabilly
Probably a bad batch of Kool Aid....Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari
And thanks for not accusing me of not wanting a poll....Quote:
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
I've never denied that Vettel shared a large part of the blame. I just don't feel that it's right for a driver who's behind to just hold their line if it means having an accident, especially with a team mate. If you believe that Webber is 0% to blame then this can only mean that you think Vettel intentionally crashed into Webber on purpose which is just unthinkable.
not much loss, as i already went blind-as others around here seem to think--but what they do not know is twas from "other activities" having not anything to do with kool aid, Mr Fool. :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by 555-04Q2
Such an backlash, demos well the love for their hero, chopper, versus that evil german austrian empire and its driver :vader:
And anyone who does not see webbers quick flick-moving the wheel towards Vettel--and back again--- of the steering wheel into vettel such that it ensures contact a micosecond later....well...... :laugh:
Now some might say, well now, that movement was from the contact, but at the point he moves his hands, there has been no contact and the contact would have forced his steering wheel the other way, as it was only partial contact with the racing surface of both tires, not a complete overlap
Perhaps Webber's intent was to bump the outside wheels together due to anger of being passed...but it was clearly deliberate
unlike others, when wrong, I have no problem admitting same....
Thanks Henners :up:
and speaking of evil empires, all those video links are now gone, thank you, F1 management
Must be conspiring with Mr. Chopper and red bull, to keep those red bull sales from plummenting to zero.... :rotflmao:
It matters not whether Vettel intended the collision or not. I am sure it was a mistake, a misjudgement or merely a loss of control.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
But.
He caused it, therefore the blame lies with him.
A racing incident, both were to blame - Vettel slightly more so, say 55-60%. I don't believe either driver deserves greater blame.
Red Bull drinks are liked by too many morons - the type you see vomiting in the street outside the local Whetherspoons pub on a Friday/Saturday night.Quote:
Originally Posted by markabilly
Sod the sports aspect, after all, there is lucozade for the serious sportsperson.
No, Mark was rightly defending his lead. SOmething the leader is entitled to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by wedge
Seb chose which side to attempt the pass.
Mark kept the line tight, but did not squeeze Seb.
Seb did the squeezing, as he knew the pass would only stick if he could brake.
Now, the videos tell us that there was an immense amount of dust kicked up br Seb's tyres, he will have been seriously compromised in the braking zone due to dirty tyres.
I seriously doubt his ability to outbrake Mark.
Mark knew that.
Which is why he positioned his car as he did - Enough room for Seb, but no more.
Even Mark's team understand this now.