Printable View
I have PM'd you but why should you erase my posts which as far as I can see breaks no forum rules and leave others up that do?Quote:
Originally Posted by janneppi
Then you let others drag topics off course and pick me up when I'm trying to justify my opinion as to the thread :confused:
I think you have a problem with me and if so, I suggest you stick it where the sun doesn't shine... only if you do of course. :p
Not sure if this was mentioned but Glock drove the last lap like a lapped backmarker, not a driver fighting for points position a la Schumi/Hungary/2006
All due respect, Schumacher wasn't 20+ s a lap off pace in Hungary 2006. And Schumacher was dirty and unsporting in his defending in Hungary 2006.Quote:
Originally Posted by wedge
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view...ce-fix-shock-/
Hmm, shame they called you 'somebody' and not named you, that's just rude!
Surely British tabloid journalism at it's worst?
ok lets entertain the idea for a moment.
IF Mclaren paid off Toyota, who is paying who?
are we talking Ron Dennis/Martin Whitmarsh/Norbert Haug agreeing to part with team money, the organisation, or individuals fortunes?
if it was a transfer of technology, that we a) don't know that Mclaren have got any good at, and b) don't know that toyota are struggling with are we seriously expected to think that maybe in the last 3 laps of an incredibley important and tense race they found time to contact Toyota, or Glock's management, secretly, offer some "deal" cash or otherwise, in return for giving up a hard won place, get that deal agreed (given that it would have to be secret there can be no paper trail, so no contract, and no way of holding Mclaren to it, as you can hardly come out and say, "we let you win the champ and didn't get our £x millions or Kers technonlgy, so we're suing you!".)
on top of this, contact the driver, over the FIA monitored radio and deliver a secret message that Glock would understand to slow down, but that the FIA haven't noticed or investigated, and no other teams, team members or any contempary connected with F1 has actually suggested or complained about.
all at the same time, managing to coreograph the move to coincide with Trulli also losing exactly the same amount of time on the last lap, and still gain points as a result of the original tactical decision?
wouldn't it have been easier to contact toyota earlier and ask them to follow any tyre strategy that Mclaren do in the case of rain to make sure they stay in front - which would of course go completley unnoticed?
where is the Ferrari outcry, Flavio's outrageous accusations, Alonsos dark mutterings, FIA's investigations - sorry, no smoke, absolutley no fire, probably COS IT WAS RAINING SO HARD AT THE END OF THE RACE!
I can't believe that (apart from Daily Star readers) anyone would take any of this seriously!
Oi, stop trolling :p : :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Mark
Only the last lap where Glock lost it. Makes no difference, IMO, it's the last lap for godsake!Quote:
Originally Posted by PolePosition_1
Kimi did everthing right to fend off Lewis at Spa.
And the only thing Schumi did wrong in Hungary 2006 was not giving up his position when he overshot the chicane. Tactically poor as he should've changed to slicks, everything else was near perfect from a racer's POV.
There are no Daily Star readers: they just look at the pictures.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian McC
Careful. A particular Mod will come down on you for such personal insults and question whether you are a decent human being ;) :laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Jan Yeo