http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xos2M...eature=relatedQuote:
Originally Posted by René
Printable View
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xos2M...eature=relatedQuote:
Originally Posted by René
Guys, you talkin' about Monte Carlo or about N.O.T. sexual orientation?
both subjects are equally interesting i think...Quote:
Originally Posted by AP-Racing
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
Try to take a vacation from this "depressive" forum and sign in some mental facilities!?
Sordos time on ss6 adjusted..not fastest.
The Proton and PG are setting better times than last year, so the car development has moved them forward it seems.
Pity Basso as the asphalt man in the team missed on ss1.
Get real.. who knew about Go Fast Energy company a few days ago? And how many do know now?
By the way, latest weather maps are not confirming Malcolms words.. it does look tht something is coming down, but it does not look lite it is snow.
Sordo loses a lot...lets see if Solberg can take advantage of that....
Loeb is just unstoppable... what an athlete.
It the driver is slow, it is better for the sponsors, since people can read the ads easily!
That's a question that must be answered by the anti-superally fundamentalists :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Wasted Talent
I agree. The superally was a positive thing to maintain more cars during the rally, giving the oportunity to the ones that retired to not loose everything. The format could be tunned, but was a good principle and allowed the drivers to take more risks at the beggining.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wasted Talent
About the rally, Loeb is running cool and without worries. Even being Monte Carlo, he has the rally controled.
And there is a funny situation:
Loeb is alone on the front, people blame that Loeb alone is not interesting (and in fact it isn't).
Yesterday a guy was able to challenge Loeb, but took risks and went off. People blame that Latvala should had not taken risks.